Jump to content

ERGONOMICS: Making Your Bike Fit You - Part Two


er·go·nom·ics: a science that deals with designing and arranging things so that people can use them easily and safely: the parts or qualities of something's design that make it easy to use (Webster).


In our previous installment, we talked about how to improve the ergonomics of your machine in a number of different ways, including some simple yet effective methods of changing the dynamics of the rider to bike interface. These included products like longer/shorter brake and shift levers, bar risers, larger/offset footpegs, seat modifications and handlebar options.


In the world of riding off-road motorcycles, the ability to “get your feet down” so they can support you when unstable is paramount. Without it, riding in off-road conditions is extremely difficult as well as unsafe. Because of the serious nature of this issue, we’ll focus on items like lowering links and the associated family of products because this is the “last stop” for shorter riders looking to modify their machines for optimum control.


The geometry of a motorcycle is a precise thing. Modern manufacturers use sophisticated computer testing algorithms coupled with CAD/CAM modeling and human interface testing to arrive at a product that offers maximum safety and stability. Frame specifications like rake and trail become of paramount importance and trying to preserve these ratios and setups is important when modifying a motorcycle to be lower to the ground.


When modifying the rear suspension for a shorter seat height, it’s common to use a lowering link. Simply put, this is a replacement for part of the stock linkage that allows the motorcycle to sit lower and offer a shorter seat height. But these linkage modifications don’t come without drawbacks…behavior such as headshake and insufficient ground clearance can become problems if not addressed when adding lowering link.


Some more serious riders and off-road racers don’t like lowering links for a variety of reasons and some of them make sense. But the modifications they champion such as spacers and shortened forks and shock/springs also have their drawbacks like limited suspension travel, complexity and expense.


My personal feeling is that if you are an extremely fast amateur or professional racer, you may want to consider trying to keep your feet up and going faster as opposed to changing the geometry of your race machine, but if you are a weekend warrior, trail/enduro rider who needs help getting your feet down, this could be an answer for you. Keep in mind these lowering links normally cost under $200 and on some bikes the installation is under an hour!


Different manufacturers offer lowering links and also items such link guards, which can offer a slight bit of lowering coupled with added protection for exposed linkages and we’ll look at a few of these offerings.


Devol Racing has been offering lowering links for some time and is known as a leader in this segment, offering links for both motocross and enduro-style machines with up to 1.5” drop. Devol claims many features for these units, including being lightweight and stronger than stock as well as improving front end stability and rear end tracking.


Ride Engineering offers both lowering links as well as full linkage assemblies and they claim that the full assembly can improve the suspension action and handling entering corners (by holding the shock up in the stroke more) and is more plush on acceleration chop exiting the turn. By offering both components instead of just the outer or inner one, ride height remains unchanged (0-2mm drop depending on year).


ProMotoBillet offers the Fastway Linkage Guard, which is a different take on a lowering link and offers both linkage protection and a modicum of adjustability for riders. Fastway claims multiple suspension adjustments: stock, .6mm, 1.3mm and 2mm, potential for lower seat height, improvement in front end steering and cornering, protection for your expensive shock and linkage from damage all resulting in better over-obstacle traction.



Photo: Fastway Link Guard


We took some time to ask around the business and see who would be a good resource for some of this information and one name kept coming up: Norman Kouba. Norm runs Kouba Link and offered a wealth of information on this subject. Let’s get a bit of his insight on lowering links and the associated benefits and drawbacks of using them.


ThumperTalk: What is a lowering link and what does it do?


Norm Kouba: A lowering link is a longer than stock link (or links) that lowers the rear of (your motorcycle) by changing the starting point of the swingarm arc. In most cases (lowering) links are used to connect the frame to the rear suspension and swingarm on linkage style rear suspension motorcycles. The advantage of the linkage style suspensions on most bikes is (that) you have a rising rate suspension that gets stiffer the farther you get into the travel.


TT: What happens to the bike's geometry when JUST the lowering link is used?


NK: Installing a lowering link only lowers the rear so if the same geometry is desired then the front requires some attention. Just keep in mind that lowering the rear more than the front slows the steering but also makes it more stable on the straights and vice versa.


TT: What can riders do to "equalize" their bike's suspension after installing a lowering link? Can riders get the rake/trail back close to stock if needed?


NK: In most cases the fork tubes can be slid up (in the triple clamps) enough (to compensate) as long as the OEM recommended race sag or less is maintained. Usually the longer links put more leverage on the rear spring so the spring requires more preload to maintain that amount of race sag.



Photo: Kouba Link Installed


The best advice is set the bike up for the conditions you ride most as the stock geometry may not be the best for all riders and/or conditions. We usually recommend less race sag for the best performance but that does take away from the lowering amounts of the longer links.


Lessening the race sag will put the suspension in a less progressive part of the travel which is plusher over the small stuff, and also gives you more travel remaining for the bigger hits.


TT: What other things can be done to lower a motorcycle for shorter riders?


NK: Not a lot of things can be done economically other than cutting down the seat or lessening the race sag until the feet touch the ground. The problem with those two (solutions) are you either harm the riders bottom or you harm the bike's suspension. You can also slide the fork tubes up until they almost touch the underside of the handlebars but be careful going much more (by installing handle bar risers) as you may not know how far the fork tubes can be slid up without allowing the tire to hit the fender when bottomed out.


The other options are lowering links, shortening the shock and/or forks internally, cutting down the rear subframe Ricky Carmichael style, or going to smaller diameter tires. That is all that comes to mind other than built up boots!




In conclusion, although there are certain drawbacks such as decreased ground clearance and potential rake/trail issues when using these products, these can be compensated for with some due diligence. We believe that professional racers and faster amateur riders may not want to explore this option and could be better served with shortening the suspension components individually, but for the average rider, these lowering link solutions can offer an inexpensive and easy-to-install answer for providing a lower chassis for shorter and beginner riders.

User Feedback

Recommended Comments

You state Devol lowering links lower a bike up to 1.5".  You state that the Ride Engineering link lowers the bike 0 - 2 mm.

Also that the ProMotoBillet product lowers the bike a certain MM.

Are you sure the last 2 should be also in inches and not mm?

Share this comment

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You state Devol lowering links lower a bike up to 1.5".  You state that the Ride Engineering link lowers the bike 0 - 2 mm.

Also that the ProMotoBillet product lowers the bike a certain MM.

Are you sure the last 2 should be also in inches and not mm?


The 0, .6, 1.3, and 2mm figures are the offset from the stock length of the link, not the amount of drop. If you look at the picture you can see the eccentric insert on the left of the link.

Share this comment

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some folks I've discussed lowering with are really concerned about handling changes that lowering links might cause. I only have a 31-inch inseam and I've done it on several bikes that I use for brisk trail riding.  I find that as long as the front end is lowered about as much as the rear, there is not a problem -- other than the possible need for a stiffer spring on the rear shock to make up for the increased leverage that lowering links create.


I've found that if you can dial in the original sag amount, you are probably OK.


One alternative for lowering the rear not mentioned is the adjustable-length-style link. A firm named "Soupy's" is the leader in this technology.


The advantage of having adjustable links is simple: You can play around with ride height and its adjuncts until you get a height that works best for you and your riding style. There are real advantages over fixed-length links. If you don't need a full inch lower, you can dial adjustable links in to some height that is only half or three quarters of an inch lower than stock. I


Good article and a great myth-debunker for those who'd like a lower ride height.

Share this comment

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I put the lowest drop kouba link on my 2012 klx250s dropped the front forks and set sag at 4". Bike handles better than stock version, easily flat tracks washboard forest road corners and climbs rocky terrain better than my old KDX 200 with a professionally done suspension. Money well spent

Share this comment

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As he mentions briefly, a change in spring rate and probably valving should come with a lowering link. If you change the linkage ratio you need to adjust the valving to compensate for the different amount of travel in the actual shock using the new linkage ratio.

Share this comment

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Reply with:

  • Similar Content

    • By Leo Vereen
      Only a few days left cant wait to get there and camp and do some grilling out. Will get there early friday hope its not to wet. There is a 40 to 50 percent chance of rain all week. Could be another mudder.
    • By Freemotion
      BORE (MM)72
      REAR TIREDUNLOP® GEOMAX AT81 110/100 R18 64M
      SEAT HEIGHT (IN)37.8
      DRY WEIGHT (LBS)221.6
      WHEELBASE (IN)58.4
    • By Enduro Girl Rider
      Hello everyone!
      Looking for help with AMA rules and off road racing rules. 2018 was my first year racing.  I'm not familiar with rules of moving up.
      I  competed in Sprint Enduro series in womens C class. I raced 7 of 8 rounds. 2 days of racing in each round. I didn't had much of competition,  I computed  against only 4 riders and they were almost twice my age. I won 4 of 7 rounds and with that I won championship. By rules of sprint enduro riders who win championship and 2nd and 3rd place finishers who won at least 2 events overall have to move up in next class.  If I choose to race in this series again I have to move up to A/B class there are no B class for women. And I would be racing against women who have been racing for years and much faster than me.
       For women who got 2nd place and won 2 overalls organizer made an exception because of her age, kept her in women C for 2019.  And making me move up, And I feel that I'm not B rider yet.   For 2019 I want to try GNCC Or even local series.  In womens C in GNCC series I think I will place in a mind pack. 
       I was looking at AMA rules of advancement. My name is not listed in B class advancement list.  Because I raced in only 14 races and my RVP is 14 not 15.  By  AMA rules I should be advanced if I have 15 or higher.  I called AMA to check  They telling me that I earned advancement by the series so I should move up. But in the rules of AMA  It doesn't say  if you winning the series you should move up. 
       So if I race in GNCC should I move up to A/B or compete in C class?
    • By MANIAC998
      Ballards was the premiere Yamaha team to ride for, and they won numerous Championship’s through the years. Here he gives his input on the new Yamaha WR450.
      (Sorry Mog)
    • By Erik Marquez
      This preventative Maintenance "fix" is applicable and recommended for ALL YEAR and model year DRZ 2000 -2013
      Why does my counter shaft (C/S) sprocket get loose? Is it the nut? Or something else? The “Loose” sprocket” situation in most cases really is not what it seems; the C/S nut is not coming loose. Though that can be a contributing factor. http://www.thumperta...=1&d=1277642132

      24 CIRCLIP
      18 WASHER
      15 GEAR, 3RD DRIVEN (NT:22)
      16 GEAR, 4TH DRIVEN (NT:24)
      13 GEAR, 2ND DRIVEN (NT:26)
      14 BUSH, 2ND DRIVEN
      33 SPROCKET, ENGINE (NT:15)
      38 WASHER

      These are the parts that are located or clamped togeather between Circlip #24 and the Countershaft sprocket nut #37 The theory, which in follow on years has been substantially proven though wide spread use of the “Loctite Fix” and follow on inspections. Is that wear of the C/S second gear bushing is what causes the “loose” C/S sprocket nut. Users find the C/S nut loose and then tighten the nut, against what is now a worn, mushroomed bushing, this causes bind in the counter shaft. A little may go unnoticed for many miles, a little more bind, and the bushing will seize to the gear, counter shaft or both. Causing hundreds of dollars in repair and possible a crash when the transmission sizes. It's believed the primary cause of second gear bushing wear, is the slight rotation of the sprocket on the counter shaft. There is not an interference fit between the sprocket splines and the counter shaft splines, which is what allows this movement.

      TT User Noble and Sargentrab, the original investigators of this issue initially thought the second gear bushing wear /deformation was caused by over tightening the nut...
      So we have identified the problem as, loose fit between the C/S sprocket splines and those of the countershaft. Again Noble noted
      This theory was originally derived from inspection of three DRZ transmissions, but has since proven true with many others, to include my own and many I have worked on over the years.

      The Fix, or.. How to:

      The fix: As the root cause issue is clearance between the C/S splines, and the sprocket the fix is focused on that. Using an Anaerobic threadlocker (AKA Loctite) that cures to thermoset plastic when it comes into contact with metal in the absence of air, used on the splines and C/S threads has been proven on hundreds, if not thousands of DRZ’s to stop the rocking motion of the sprocket and thus the wear of the second gear bushing solving the mystery of the “loosening C/S sprocket nut”

      The procedure: What brand or type Anaerobic threadlocker you use is dependent on what is available in your area. The established standard shown to work when done as advised is Loctite brand (Henkel corp) High Strength Thread locker PN 271 263 (NOTE: Henkel corp Updated their product line.. 263 is now the correct product number, replacing 271) .
      In the years since this procedure was established we have had two employees from Loctite visit the forums and speak on the use of Anaerobic threadlocker for this application. One company representative stated emphatically the use of a thread locker would not work, he implied we were idiots for trying and wasting our time. When it was pointed out that we had been using Loctite 271 for many months and it in fact did do what we needed. The company rep implied we were idiots and never came back.LOL
      The second company representative , had a much better attitude, was very helpful and stated, while he acknowledged our success in using the 271 product, a better option was available. Loctite retaining compound 680 or 638 was recommended.

      The problem is, that product was marketed for heavy equipment or  industrial use and not widely available. Some members have not been able to locate these products at any location industrial or not. Others have found 680 or 638 at Farm equipment suppliers (John Deer) or Fastener and bearing suppliers are great places to find Anaerobic threadlocker or retaining products used on heavy equipment or industrial machinery.

      Which brings us back to the tried and proven to work commonly available Loctite brand High strength threadlocker 263. This is the product recommended, many other like products will work I’m sure,, If 263 is not available to you,, Choose a like product from another manufacture.

      Start with removing the counter shaft nut and sprocket, clean and degrease the threads and splines using brake or contact cleaner. Remove all scale and rust. (Note, on rare occasions the sprocket may be difficult to remove due to rust or corrosion. Or if this is a used bike, a previous owner may have already done the Loctite fix. And the sprocket will likely need a small two jaw puller to remove),

      Remove and clean the spacer, and check the O ring behind it and replace. If the spacer is deeply grooved or pitted / rusted. it will need to be replaced, and the seal as well.

      Apply 4 drops (More is not better, if you douse the splines and the loctite gets under the spacer and into the seal area, once it sets, the seal can be damaged) of 263 to the splines of the counter shaft, just outboard of where the sprocket will rest once installed. Distribute the drops around the shaft evenly.

      The threadlocker tends to wick into the spline gaps, so you really do not need to slather a lot on to get the job done. Install the spacer and o rings onto the C/S, and then the sprocket.

      Use a drop of 263 on the counter shaft threads and install the lock washer & C/S nut. Using the chain as a holding tool, tighten the C/S nut to 105 ftlb.

      Remove the chain and rotate the countershaft by hand, It should rotate without any binding. Some drag will be present and is expected. If it rotates freely, then you are good to go. Bend the locking washer over, let the thread locker cure for a minimum of 8 hours and go ride. There is a lot more to anaerobic thread sealant and thread lockers, Different types, primers that can be used to prep the surface and or speed cure time. Cure time based on temp, air in contact with the product, type of metal in contact… And that would make a great 20 page thread in the general forum… But the bottom line, no matter what the product data sheet says for Loctite brand High Strength thread locker 263. No matter what a company rep may say. It works in this application.

      Removing the sprocket after installing it using Loctite 263: Lastly, we come too, “How do I get this sprocket off, once I have installed it using Loctite 263 to help fix it in place?”

      Anaerobic thread sealant does become soft when heated. The problem with heating the counter shaft and sprocket is, there are o ring and a seal that reside right behind that sprocket which might be damaged by the heat. So go easy.
      Use heat on the nut to soften the thread lock, then remove the nut.
      The simplest method I and others have found to remove the sprocket is to use a small two or three jaw gear puller. Commonly available from most any automotive tool supply house, or Sears for that matter. . Rent or buy the puller, it’s a good tool investment.

      Using the chain and rear brake as a holding tool, flatten the lock washer, and remove the C/S nut. If you use an impact gun to remove the nut, make sure the transmission is not in gear.

      Remove the chain, and place the puller jaws over the sprocket. Make sure the puller screw is centered in the counter shaft. Apply some pressure to the puller. If you use an air impact gun, the sprocket will come right off. If your using a ratchet or wrench, tighten the puller, then give the center screw a light rap with a dead blow hammer.. The sprocket will break free and can now be removed.

      New or updated information and products would always be welcome. So if you have something new, quote this thread and start a new one. Let’s discuss it and see what comes up. Thanks. Thanks for looking, Fix that loose sprocket and go ride. I’d like to thank Noble and Sargentrab for their original work in discovering what was causing this problem, and devising a solution that has been proven with the test of time.

      Parts required for the repair of a leaking counter shaft seal are:

      SEAL, DRIVE SHAFT OIL 09283-30053
      O RING (D:2.5,ID:21) 09280-21008

      Often the screws holding the seal retainer are damaged if you attempt removal without first heating them to 250c to loosen any thread locking compound, and do not use an impact screwdriver. If danged and need be replaced,they are BOLT, RETAINER (6X14) 09126-06007
      However they can be replaced with common hardware, countersunk screw, grade 8.8 and above 6mm x 14mm
      Replacement nut and washer are:
      ENG SPROCKET WASHER 09167-22012
      ENGINE SPROCKET NUT 09140-18006
      If you just a complete parts kit, here's one from All Balls (also sold under the brands of MSR and Moose):