Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

Selecting the Right Handlebar Set-up

Bryan Bosch

As a parts/accessories dealer, everyday, someone calls for help in selecting the right handlebar for their needs. Obviously they know the year/make/model of thier bike, but for the most part, there isn't a chart that says if you ride this bike and want the bike to feel like XYZ, you need ABC handlebars. So, how do you select the right handlebar?

The first decision is handlebar diameter. All off-road motorcycle handlebars are the same diameter out on the ends (where your grips are), but at the point of mounting (at the triple clamp), they are either 7/8 or 1 1/8" (AKA fatbars). The one exception that I can think of is the Easton EXP at 1 3/8". In the past, just about all stock handlebars were 7/8", but that's no longer the case.

7/8" Handlebar with crossbar


1 1/8" Handlebar

pro taper.jpg

A key factor in this decision is how your triple clamp set-up currently is. There are two types of handlebar mounts. The first is a triple clamp where the lower handlebar mounts are cast into the top clamp itself. This is most commonly found on the Suzuki DR-Z and older Yamaha WR and YZ models for example. These are almost always OEM and come to think of it, I've never seen them from aftermarket suppliers. Typically cast handlebar mounts are 7/8", so if you want to run 1 1/8" handlebars, you'll need a set of 7/8" to 1 1/8" handlebar adapters (aka bar risers). It's important to note that when these are used, you have to factor the height they'll add into the total height that you want to achieve. For example, if you like the stock handlebar height and the adapters add 3/4" in rise, you'll need to find a handlebar bend that is 3/4" lower than stock to offset this. Outside of the standard handlebar adapters, some also come with a choice in height, adjustable height units and up/forward configurations.

7/8" > 1 1/8" Handlebar Adaptors


The second type of handlebar mounts are removable mounts. For this type, the lower handlebar mounts are secured by a stud that bolts through the top clamp (solid or rubber mounted) and are secured from underneath by nylon lock nuts and washers. The top bar mount bolts to the lower half and can be purchased in 7/8" or 1 1/8" sizes. Some mount the handlebar dead center while others have offset (usually 5mm or so), allowing you mount your handlebars fore (further from the rider) or aft of the center point of the bar mount.

7/8" or 1 1/8" Removable Handlebar

Mounts with 5mm Offset


There are also specialty mounts, like those from Rox Speed FX that are designed not only to accept standard or fatbars, have a choice a different heights, but they also pivot forward and aft. This offers riders another level of handlebar orientation flexibility, but is also something that has to be factored into the total handlebar mount and handlebar package.


The bike manufacturers know that there is a certain amount of cache associated with fatbars (perceived as an upgrade), but at least in my experience, I'm not sure the choice is that clear cut. Some maintain that 1 1/8" handlebars, which are typically crossbar-less (excluding the Renthal Twinwall Handlebar) have more progressive flex (less trauma to the hands/wrists and reduced arm pump), but outside of running Fasstco Flexxbars, I can't say that I've noticed any real difference between the stock Renthal 7/8's that came on my bike and the Pro Taper Easton Taperwalls that I've run in terms of feel and resistance to bending (both took some good hits). But, I'm 100% confident that you'll get different opinions here. However, I will say that having no crossbar seems to make the cockpit feel a bit more open and if you're running a top mounted steering stabilizer, its the only way to go.

Now that you've selected the handlebar diameter you want and how to mount them, you need to select the bend you want. In my experience, the best way to do this is to establish a baseline by confirming the key measurements of your current bars. The key measurements are width, height, rise, and sweep.


With the key measurements of your current handlebars, you can then compare the different values to the bend listing charts from the manufacturer for the handlebars you want. Think about how your bike feels and ask yourself what would make the bike more comfortable, both sitting and standing. For the most part, people that call us are looking for handlebars that are taller and with less sweep, as a number of handlebars come stock feeling like they are in your lap. Of course, the taller you are, the worse the problem.

It is important to note that changes in bar height greater than approx. 20mm+ will begin to cause some issues with your control cables. On my bike, when I installed a Scott's sub mount stabilizer, my bars were raised 25mm over stock. At full turn to the turn to the left, my throttle would not return to the closed position. I was able re-route the cable to avoid this, so be VERY careful with tall bar set-ups.

The right handlebar orientation is not only a comfort issue, it plays a key roll in allowing you to right in the right position on the bike. So, spend the time to get your set-up right for you. It really can help to make your bike more enjoyable and handle its best.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

User Feedback

Great overview of different bar and riser types. I ride a DRZ400, which has the mount built into the triple clamp. I'm currently running fat bars with 30mm of additional risers. I am 6'2" with a long torso, so I always have trouble getting the bars high enough. Is there a rule of thumb for determining the proper amount of rise or is it just a comfort and personal preference thing?

Share this comment

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Reply with:

  • Similar Content

    • By phantomrider101
      I was thing about geting a steering damper any one had any luck with them? I ride hare scrammbles and gncc in the mid south and alot of riders use them. Just wondering how well they work before I throw down that much cash for one. What kind do you guys recomend? I've been lookin at the WER anyone have any experience with them?
    • By ogrider650
      has anyone used these? i have a nagging wrist injury that just keeps re-agrivating itself when i race. i was looking at these only becasue they are alot cheaper than the fasst flexx bars any input?
    • By yz440e
      Hey guys ive seen alot of stabilizer questions lately and since we currently own 3 different stabilizers, I figured I would try and help out TT a little with a comparison between the three...
      Stabilizers in test:
      >GPR V1 mounted on top of the bars with a Fastway adjustable mount system & RG3 Gen 2 (Top and Bottom) Triple Clamps with pro tapers
      >Scotts mounted on top of the bars with a scotts upper triple clamp with Renthal twinwalls (crossbar removed)
      >WER mounted to front fender (no other option)
      The GPR is mounted to a 2002 Honda CR250R
      The Scotts is mounted to a 2002 Yamaha YZ250
      The WER is mounted to a 1999 KX250
      All bikes are set up and used for off-road only
      All stabilizers are in correct working order
      On the Fly Adjustments---------8/10
      >Easiest to adjust on the fly
      >Awesome Anodized Colors
      >Easy 2 bolt mounting
      >You can feel it working
      >Works as advertised
      >Dampens back to the center
      >Not as adjustable as the SCOTTS, it has high speed and low speed dampening on one circuit
      >You can feel it working, in the tight woods I feel like I am fighting it.
      >Dampens back to the center

      On the Fly Adjustments---------7/10
      >Cool gold color
      >Very adjustable, high speed on one knob and low speed on another
      >Can be adjusted so that you are never fighting it
      >Easy to mount
      >You can’t feel it working until you need it.
      >Can fit under many stock cross bars when mounted backwards
      >Not so easy to adjust on the fly, may be different wit large knob accessory
      >A bit pricier than GPR yet still very reasonable.
      (The YZ's a little dirty after yesterdays ride:busted:)

      On the Fly Adjustments---------4/10
      >Nearly impossible to detect that its working
      >Mounts out of the way, on the front fender
      >Decent look
      >Easy to bleed and not as many moving parts or seals as SCOTTS or GPR
      >Excellent price
      >Really not sure how much it does
      >Nearly impossible to adjust on the fly, (I tried and almost crashed)
      >Not very easy to mount
      >Have to cut hole in front number plate

      >Scotts can be mounted under bars as a sub mount kit for saftey
      >Scotts can be mounted on the front fender, this is called a low mount kit, (like the WER)
      >Scotts can be mounted backwards to fit under stock crossbars
      >GPR sells a V2 Kit which mounts under the bars and is part of the bar mounts, so it can not be mounted on top of the bars.
      >GPR also offers a V3 which you can adjust on the handle bars with a twist adjuster.
      >WER only mounts on the fender, no other option
      These are the only stabilizers that I had the resources to test, all of the stabilizers worked well although the GPR and SCOTTS were the best. I prefer the SCOTTS just slightly over the GPR. This is only my opnion, I have friends who swear by the GPR and others who wont ride without a SCOTTS.
      I will be going to the sand with these bikes within the next couple of weeks and will post some info of how they perform there too.
      Hope This Helps Someone!!!
      All Credit goes to MX813 for this review on the EMIG Racing Stabilizer: