As some of you may have recently seen I had an 09 sx250 with 300 big bore kit that was a bit much for me. I was going to play with it over a period of a few weeks to tame the hit, but decided I couldnt be bothered with it all. I want a bike I can just ride when I want to ride it. I have the 200 for enduros, want an mx bike for mx! I put it on ebay and within 24 hours it had gone, for exacly what I paid which was nice.Im looking at a few bikes, their all 2011/2012 ktm 125's or 150's. I believe there is a question to be answered by people who own/have owned these bikes.Given that I am a slower rider, and the tracks I will ride are hilly and sandy, in the past I have often struggled with a small bore with gear selection. Granted this is 100% me, I know a 125 is fully capable!Searching around the net you often read that a 150 is good for 'lazier' riding. It has that bit of extra torque that helps a little. BUT, you will also read on the net that the 125 actually has more bottom - mid pull. The area that the 150 excels is mid-top. With me been a slower rider, on hilly sandy tracks, would I actually then be better off on a 125 over a 150? As mid-top is not going to be happening all that much with me.Its hard to get a proper answer so I needed advice of people who have used the two in the real world. Its like with silencers, you see people say a shorty will give more bottom end but less top, and a long silencer will give more bottom end and top. With that statement why does anyone bother with shortys? There must be more to it, and dyno results would be the best way of proving which silencer is better.cheers!