Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  

Are the YZ250s now too old....?

Recommended Posts

I was reading a local forum down here in Australia where a few forum members were being a bit derogatory towards our beloved 250's. So after losing lots of sleep with worry & dread I thought I would put up a post here on TT to gauge the true believers responses. 

Some of the comments talked about the old ergos, the "fat seat", the too short swing arm, the old frame design which was just a copy of a steel frame, the old design motor (compared to the new euro bikes), the old plastics etc etc. Positive main saviour comment of the YZ is that the SSS forks and the big 18mm shock help the bike. I also notice they are still winning races down here & over there at elite levels so they cant be that bad!

Now I've ridden a couple of the "new" euro bikes and must say the KTM/Berg 300 motor is nice but frame / chassis wise it was vague & twitchy, heavier and no where as nimble as my YZ. I've spent a bucket modding my engine to get it right and love my bike but now Im considering therapy....

Are they that far behind the Euros? Am I flogging a dead horse? Has Yamaha just been complacent or was the YZ that good that they didn't need to change? Help me out TT, you guys all brain washed me into getting one....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Comparing the YZ250 to the KTM250SX the YZ is heavier, has less horsepower, doesn't look as modern, and has barely changed in 8 years.

 

So on paper yes the KTM would seem to be a better bike.

 

Personally I love my '13 YZ250 and could care less about what other people say.  The YZ250 is a great bike bottom line.

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I bought a new KTM250sx and had it for a week.....down the road it went.  I now have a '13 YZ250........

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

While it is true that the ktm has seen more changes in the last 8 years, it case so far behind back then that it doesn't mean much. Yes, it has newer plastics and a self adjusting clutch, but the truth is there's not much advantage on the track between the two. The ktm has more power and a better front brake, but for some the YZ is still superior everywhere else.

I have asked many times on forums what made a ktm so much more "evolved" than a YZ to those raving about it. The only arguments, if any, we're about the upgraded looks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sherrif re the KTM's; Yep that's what I was thinking. A sleek new look wrapping a frame that has been changed about 5 times in the past 6 years. 

Is the basic engine design that the euros favour with the case reed (is that right?) system better?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Better or worse is pretty relative. Better for one is worse for the other The suspension components hold their own pretty well even after 8 years (more like 6 due to internal changes [:)] )

 

People love to complain about about everything so really if you like your bike who really cares? Me for one I like the fact that the engine is unchanged, that I don't have to worry to get parts just for my bike's year. Changes every year I don't see much benefit. And people who race pro level hardly ride a stock bike anyway. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I went from a KTM 250xc to my yz250 and I couldn't be happier I love the bike and I don't see why there's such a big deal about changing it. Its a great bike and I'm happy as long as Yamaha keeps producing them. I think they are great design and I love being able to open craigslist to find tons of used or new parts. And i love that my bike doesn't change every year to where I feel like my bike is old news...I rode with a KTM guy the other day that said he wished he would have waited another year to buy one just because they change So much.....ever think all that change was needed just to lately come up to par with the "dated" Yz? Hell with it I love it and I'll buy another once mine is clapped the hell out

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I went from a KTM 250xc to my yz250 and I couldn't be happier I love the bike and I don't see why there's such a big deal about changing it. Its a great bike and I'm happy as long as Yamaha keeps producing them. I think they are great design and I love being able to open craigslist to find tons of used or new parts. And i love that my bike doesn't change every year to where I feel like my bike is old news...I rode with a KTM guy the other day that said he wished he would have waited another year to buy one just because they change So much.....ever think all that change was needed just to lately come up to par with the "dated" Yz? Hell with it I love it and I'll buy another once mine is clapped the hell out

I went the other way. form an 06 yz250 to an 09 250xc ktm. Big mistake. KTM suspension sucks badly, no matter what I do to it there is no comparison to the yz. I love the plug and play lighting and the electric start but man those forks are killing me.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am looking to sell my 250f and I have been wanting to go back to a 250smoker... I am going to be buying one new... after reading this i should buy the YZ250? I really have had my head set on a SX250 Orange smoker.

 

I have no care about what color I ride... I think I have shown that...lol I just want a bike that I can trust and has loads of power :) Most of all I want a 2 stroke again.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ive ridden a buddy's 2014 ktm250sx and own an 09 yz250, personally i prefer my yz. But the problems i had with the ktm were minimal. Such as i found the suspension wasnt quite on par. But my yz has factory connection suspension and my buddy has it set up for him, a 220lb rider of about the same speed. And i found the ktm was almost too skinny. But then again i am used to my yz.

The pros i had were an great handling bike right out the box, the front brake was awesome, the power was there (felt faster than my yz with a good bit of work done to it) and the hydro clutch was pretty nice.

Overall both the yz and the ktm are great bikes. Really just depends on what bike suits you best IMO

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

KTM= Depreciating Pile of Dog Turd

 

Yz= Beautifully crafted piece of Jap Technology.

 

Sorry, I am just bitter at the moment.   Sold my '11 yz 250 .Bought a 300 xc 2012, got on ok ish with it. Damn It got rough straight away, ver y poor quality materials. Subframes are made of chocolate and wear through!!

 

I sodl the '12 with 80 hours it looked like it had done 800 hours.Although I tried my best to keep on top of it! Bought a new 2013 xc 300! Sold it after 5 months and 50 hours,lost a bucket load of money! Quality was piss poor!! I will not buy another ktm unless they sort out issues like a jacked airbox plastic rubbing through a chocolate subframe etc etc .

 

I now have two yz's ,A 09 285 and a 13 250 .They both stand me the same amount of money as one ktm! Couldn't be happier.

 

KTM's depreciate in value like mad right now in the uk.

 

The yz is probably slimmer than the KTM. Suspension on yz is miles better! etc etc .. You can  mould the yz however you like it!

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree. If it aint broke dont fix it.

I like my 03 yz250. I had an 87 250 before it and liked it just as much. Really wish I didn5 sell it.

Pick a bike that you like and stick with it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I old ergos, the "fat seat", the too short swing arm, the old frame design which was just a copy of a steel frame, the old design motor (compared to the new euro bikes), the old plastics etc etc.

none of that matters to me. I just play around with it in the fields and some trails. I'm not spending 6-8k on a new bike. Id love one though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A good motor still sucks if the bike handles poorly. ktm has a better motor (when not broken) but its lackluster wp suspension will beat the crap out of you in a long moto

 

I have not ridden a 250sx since it went to linkage so i cant say myself.

 

But the yz250 has a great motor, suspension that is so good it still comes on a brand new 2014 250-450f. And it just plain works. My plan is to pick up a 2007+ yz250 and build what Yamaha should have built already

 

  • fix squish in head (this goes a long way to making up a hp or two it lacks compared to ktm)
  • 2009 yz450f swingarm linkage and rear hub/spokes
  • 22.5 triple clamps
  • newer number plate and front fender.
  • 270 mm rotor (irp)
  • 2007+ cr/crf front master cylinder and brake pads
  • shorten stock silencer to 10 inches

 

Its the great white shark of mx bikes, it doesn't need to change, it does what its supposed to do perfectly as is.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If the primary question being asked "which bike looks  better"  than yes you have to give props to KTM for keeping the cosmetics current.

 

If the primary question being asked is "which is a better bike" than IMO it's the YZ hands down, (at least from a gritty hardcore MX standpoint) . I've said before, strip off the plastics and current YZ 2s chassis and suspension technology is NO less than any other current  bike. Those KTM's with thier WP suspensions definitely lack MX capabilities , however in praising KTM's they are the top choice when it comes to enduro . They are also a very high quality built bike, but you also take it right in the a$$ when purchasing replacement OEM parts .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A good motor still sucks if the bike handles poorly. ktm has a better motor (when not broken) but its lackluster wp suspension will beat the crap out of you in a long moto

 

I have not ridden a 250sx since it went to linkage so i cant say myself.

 

But the yz250 has a great motor, suspension that is so good it still comes on a brand new 2014 250-450f. And it just plain works. My plan is to pick up a 2007+ yz250 and build what Yamaha should have built already

 

  • fix squish in head (this goes a long way to making up a hp or two it lacks compared to ktm)
  • 2009 yz450f swingarm linkage and rear hub/spokes
  • 22.5 triple clamps
  • newer number plate and front fender.
  • 270 mm rotor (irp)
  • 2007+ cr/crf front master cylinder and brake pads
  • shorten stock silencer to 10 inches

 

Its the great white shark of mx bikes, it doesn't need to change, it does what its supposed to do perfectly as is.

Right there is exactly what the YZ needs. If Yamaha would just do these mods from the factory, they would put the KTM well behind again. I have all of the above mods on my 06 YZ, those are imo most of the very few mods that actually improve the YZ, unlike the MXA article which was mostly nonsense.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Reply with:

Sign in to follow this  

  • Similar Content

    • By Lone Danger
      Ok so I'm looking for opinions from those who have been on yz125s and 150 exc/xcw's and maybe the ktm 200's exc/xcw's. You gotta be out there.
      Here's the deal...I'm 5'7" 165lbs. A couple years back I was looking for a small bike for my wife to learn on and for me to play around with and race. Could only afford one bike. I got a '09 ktm 105 sx. Once I got it sprung for my weight it was great. I have been top five consistently in my local harescrambles B class, believe it or not. Ya, you were not the only ones shocked. And did pretty good in the local mx races as well, junior class up here in Canada. Lack of power was sometimes an issue but I learned to deal with it and just scream, scream, scream!
      However my wife is a complete beginner and she is scared of it. I have since moved her to a 4 stroke.
      Just got a mint '01 yz15 mid summer. Like less than 200 hrs! I have absolutely loved it on the mx track. Suspension is perfect and I love the extra power. I had planned to set it up for woods/mx with a suspension revalve. However, did a harescramble race a month ago that was really technical. Granted I have not done anything to the suspension minus clickers, had too much psi in the tires (13 front and 15 rear) (yes I know that's wonkey, I only had time to get a heavy duty tube in the front and had a stock tube in back. Less psi in the back would have been instant pinch flat because its so rocky) and it was running rich. I had to scream the thing to keep it running and even changed a plug mid race. Well I'm sure you can guess but it was the worst experience I have ever had on a motorcycle. The more open sections I passed a lot of people but the tech sections required way more effort than I liked and the suspension beat the hell out of me!!! Like my knees, wrists, and shoulders were just done. (I was out there for three hours).
      So keep in mind that I just came off a 105sx with suspension mods (set up for woods/mx). I have no problem slipping clutch and shifting precisely, yatta yatta. (I don't think the 105 would have done well here either due to even less power, however...) I've been second guessing fixing this 125 up for woods ever since I rode a friends '09 ktm 250xcw. I rode it on a local mx track. The power was just so effortless and I was absolutely floored by how the suspension worked. I never thought that I could hit the woops that hard and clear every jump on the track on an xcw and feel THAT good! It felt a lot heavier though, and I think the price tag on these things are going to be a stretch.
      So here's my question. I want the lightness of a 125, but want to be able to race both woods and mx. How does a 150 exc/xcw ENGINE compare to an mx 125 engine? I love the 125 engine, but more low end would be usefull in tech areas. But if there is not a huge difference, I will probably just revalve the yz for woods and go tubless, etc. The 150exc's are so expensive and I hardly ever even see one for sale unless its brand new. I don't want the weight of a 200/250/300. I barely touch the ground on a 125....so it has to at least be light. Is it worth waiting for a 150 engine? Thanks guys.
       
       
    • By doolan
      Hi guys I have a 2018 yz250 looking at changing springs front and rear I'm 200 pound ride b class moto.
      Having problems choosing spring weights using the calculators as mx tech say I need .45 fork springs and 5.2 rear but racetech say .48kg forks and 5.8kg rear.
      What are other bigger guys
    • By YamahaYz1
      Hey TT, I know there's endless topics on YZ250/ two stroke tuning in general but I have not been able to find one that helps me get my 09 YZ250 set up for my riding style and where I ride so I'm here asking for help. I got this bike around 1.5 years ago and have not known how to set it up properly. I know no one can give me a perfect set up but I'd like a good starting setup to work from and tweak to perfection. Throughout this time I've had this bike, its always been covering the bottom of the entire silencer and dripping all over the swing arm and rims with oil. Also, the joint between silencer and expansion pipe has oil around it too but I've heard I have to close the gap a little to squeeze the silencer a little tighter and stop the leakage there. I don't have too much experience messing with carbs but I've messed around with previous two strokes and tuned them a little better. I change the oil on my bike after 15-20 hours on it and clean and oil the air filter after almost every ride. The sparkplugs never last me more than a few months but recently have been lasting me no more than a few weeks. With the excess oil from the pipe and spark plug fouling you can see why I need to set my bike up to stop this. 
      The bike:
      Completely stock with V-Force 3 Reeds and a FMF Shorty silencer. 
      Usually running around 32:1 premix with 91 pump fuel because I prefer to keep it well lubricated instead of running rich.
      Riding:
      I ride enduro in Ontario, Canada. So mostly single track and some fire roads but nothing close to MX and not a lot of time wide open. Therefore, probably mostly 1/4-1/2 or 1/4-3/4 throttle range.
      Where I ride:
      Usually 0-500' above sea level. With temperatures ranging from around 15-35 degrees Celsius (55-95 Fahrenheit).
       
      If anyone can give me a setup to go from, that would be very much appreciated. Even multiple set ups for different temperature ranges or any suggestions would be much appreciated. Thanks and sorry for the long read, I just didn't want to leave anything out. Ask any questions if you have any, too.
    • By Goon Rides
      Hey guys... so I have a problem... I took the bike at Cal City, broke it in, and while I was doing so, the bike was bogging in first gear (Yes, first gear). Also it doesn't idle at all. I have to keep blipping it otherwise it'll stall. So I adjusted the screw circled in image 1. Well I was listening to the sound of the of the bike, yet the rpm's weren't increasing, and it was still stalling. So then, I unscrewed the screw in image 2, well I found out that it was fully twisted to the right. So then, I twisted it to the left, still nothing; it was still stalling... where's the idle screw? I am sure that the screw in image 1 is for the air/fuel mixture screw, and the screw in image 2 is the idle screw, just broken? I don't know, any and every help would be appreciated.


×