Jump to content

A different solution for obtaining XT fork versatility

Recommended Posts

got mine on e-bay from a m/c recycler , 115 bucks with front guards & brackets , axle was a couple bucks more. they were in perfect condition , all yz 125 stuff

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 hours ago, kawagumby said:

Hi Survivor,

These forks would fit, the upper and lower tubes are identical to the 125's forks.  However, your weight would be best suited to using the 125 forks, which have .41 springs, vs these 250 forks, which if stock, will have .43 springs.  The 250 stock valving is stiffer also...   The 125 combined stock springs' rate is just slightly higher than the stock single XT spring's at .8.

Here's a set you might be interested in : https://www.ebay.com/itm/2001-Yamaha-Yz125-Right-Left-Front-Suspension-Forks-Shocks-Set/223190749841?fits=Year%3A2001|Model%3AYZ125&epid=1028623562&hash=item33f7349291:g:IsUAAOSwH~RbxMqa:rk:48:pf:0

Things to look for when shopping forks include:   no scratches or pits on the lower fork surface,  the bottom compression allen is not rounded, no lumps or discolorations on the upper tubes (can indicated inter-granular corrosion), no broken tabs or stripped threads, the cap nut is not rounded.   Most professional motorcycle recycle businesses are good to deal with, and if there is a problem will accept returns - my experience is they have the cheapest prices and clean the parts too.  If you can get a set with fork guards in decent shape, that'll save another $30-40 also. I've purchased over ten of these forks, and average cost has been about $120 per pair including shipping (but I watch for good deals).

                                                                               

Million Thanks to Kawagumby for all he did to help me (me being a very poor mechanic / :excuseme:) to achieve my goal. He took time to double check my order! :banana:  All in all, it was only +/- $400, it is a pefect description by Kawagumby to achieve such an improvement on the suspension. Thanks again!
 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 1/15/2019 at 1:06 PM, kawagumby said:

BTW, the lower triple clamp area wall thickness of the YZ KYB forks is 5.7mm before machining.

kawagumby, could the tube be machined/shaved for that 1.1mm down one inch below the lower clamp instead of the full lenght of the thicker area (the +/-5.7mm) which seems to go a fair way below the lower clamp? Going one inch lower with the 1.1mm shaving would allow to lift it in the tripple clamp and if someone wanted to, keep the full thickness where there is no need to reduce the thickness.. If possible, can you give me the lenght in inches (reference to your YZ fork) from the top of the tube to the "one inch"lower below the lower tripple clamp Thanks again for your expertise and help.  

Edited by Survivor
clarification

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

Sure, you could limit the machined area.  On my bike, with the forks shortened 3/4",  the top of the fork cap is 11mm above the top of the upper triple clamp.  One inch below the bottom of the lower clamp is about 11 inches below that top of the fork.  (do you like the way I mixed metric and US measurements? I didn't think so...LOL.)    The only thing I would be concerned about in doing that would be the possible creation of concentrated stress - a "stress riser",  but that could likely be avoided by gradually tapering the two diameters together.

  • Helpful 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
24 minutes ago, kawagumby said:

Hi,

Sure, you could limit the machined area.  On my bike, with the forks shortened 3/4",  the top of the fork cap is 11mm above the top of the upper triple clamp.  One inch below the bottom of the lower clamp is about 11 inches below that top of the fork.  (do you like the way I mixed metric and US measurements? I didn't think so...LOL.)    The only thing I would be concerned about in doing that would be the possible creation of concentrated stress - a "stress riser",  but that could likely be avoided by gradually tapering the two diameters together.

Kawagumby, very good observation 👍 about the concentrated stress.Thanks for this advice. I guess that a distance of +/- three quarter inch for gradually tapering that 1.1mm would work fine to eliminate most of that stress :thinking:? Do you agree? Also, do you raise 11mm or +/- 7/16" for a rake change for corner reaction or to lower the motorcycle? All my stuff is coming in Ogdensburg, NY next week so it will be exciting to drive there and pick it up. To get this project on going makes me look forward to spring riding :banana: . This gets an old man like me something to talk about :blah: with his friend riders while waiting for the cold and the snow to go away! I am also like you and do mix the Metric, English and even the Decimal system in my hobby challenges. I sincerely appreciate your help :thumbsup:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Survivor said:

K👍 Also, do you raise 11mm or +/- 7/16" for a rake change for corner reaction or to lower the motorcycle?

Raising the forks to that height helped reduce effort during sweeping turns while being centered on the bike.  I would think the fork width transition you suggest would be fine - it would be interesting to see how much measurable fork flex actually occurs while riding...I wonder if there's a video of that somewhere.

  • Helpful 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Reply with:


×