Jump to content

Pro x vs Vertex Motorcycle Pistons?


Recommended Posts

  • TT Sponsor
18 hours ago, seer said:

So...? What about mine? Box clearly states made in usa.

20181211_182344.jpg

I dug a little deeper into this. There are a couple cases here and there where we don't have the demand on a specific part number to meet minimum order quantities in Japan, so those pistons end up getting manufactured in the US. Apologies for the confusion, I learned something too! 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • NoFiddyPilot changed the title to Pro x vs Vertex Motorcycle Pistons?
  • 2 weeks later...
Decided on the Pro-x.  Bike has much better mid and top end with really good over rev.  The Pro-x piston was lighter than the Vertex and you can feel it is much snappier, almost 250 like. 
Very happy
I'm guessing fresh top end with more compression and less blow by has a lot more to do with what you are feeling than piston weight does.
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, adam728 said:

I'm guessing fresh top end with more compression and less blow by has a lot more to do with what you are feeling than piston weight does.

It's a thing. Going from cast OEM or Pro X to Wiseco "pro-lite" resulted in less piston weight and freer/faster revs in 250 MX bikes that I rode.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok, I do understand piston weight makes a difference. And single ring definitely does due to friction. The point I intended to make was that it's very difficult to judge a performance improvement when things were due to be freshend up anyway. Sort of like replacing a half smashed and cracked stock pipe with something aftermarket, then claiming the difference was due to design and not condition. If things were past due then just re-ringing what was in there might have given the same performance increase.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

1 hour ago, adam728 said:

Ok, I do understand piston weight makes a difference. And single ring definitely does due to friction. The point I intended to make was that it's very difficult to judge a performance improvement when things were due to be freshend up anyway. Sort of like replacing a half smashed and cracked stock pipe with something aftermarket, then claiming the difference was due to design and not condition. If things were past due then just re-ringing what was in there might have given the same performance increase.

I agree with your logic, but honestly, I feel an actual difference in power gain, compared to my previous refresh (at same hours).  The last refresh I did was with a Vertex piston, I didn't feel any noticeable change.  It was just business as usual.  With the Pro-x piston, the bike revs faster (250 like) and makes better mid and top power (and for once has some over rev), but I will say there is some definite loss of low end grunt (almost like removing flywheel weight).  It is a little softer on the very bottom, but then right at 1/4 throttle you get a nice kick in the pants all the way to the top.  The Pro-x piston definitely felt lighter in my hands, and you could visibly see less material on the piston compared to Vertex.  I should have weighted both.

Also to note, there was a small raised center section on the Pro-x dome vs the completely flat Vertex dome.  It was a very small raised circle about where the spark plug meets the piston.  I couldn't say how raised but you fingernail would easily catch it.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, turbo dan said:

I think differences in piston weight are minute when you consider the mass of the crankshaft and flywheel.

Fresh rings helps, no doubt about it.

I am not talking 5hp, just the way the powerband feels.  It is different, more "revy" and free flowing.  Like I said, last refresh at same hours with Vertex resulted in business as usual.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Reply with:

×
×
  • Create New...