? 2002 EXC 400/520

Anyone have any reliable info yet on 2002 EXC's. Any pics, ANYTHING.

see below first impression post.


Pretend it's flat and give it the gas.

The EXCs are pretty much the same as the 01s. Different plastic colours and slightly different "KTM" logo on tank. I read somewhere that there was a couple of durability improvements, thats about it. If its not broke, dont fix it, I guess.

First Impression: 2002 KTM520SX

Friday June 29, 2001

by Garth Milan

Associate Editor Garth Milan, throws some dirt around with the '02 KTM520SX. The big Katoom is likely the only machine on planet earth that doesn't look like a pee wee under G-Brody's 6'5" frame. credit: Mike Basher

We already knew the KTM 520SX was an awesome bike, but our biggest complaint in the past about the big orange beast was its weak suspension.

To combat the problem in 2002, KTM installed a set of works-like 48mm forks to alleviate the flexing riders encountered in the past, while at the same time throwing on a new rear shock, complete with high and low speed compression adjustments.

Motorwise, the big valve-and-cam 520 stayed the same, which was fine for our tastes—it's as close to perfect as you can get already!

So were the suspension changes worthwhile? Yes! All of our test riders noticed a big difference in stability in the front end of the Katoom. Gone is the "pushing," flexy feel. Charging into corners is a much easier task now, and the bike feels like it sticks to the ground with much more authority than it has ever had in the past.

Our only suspension complaint was the front end diving we encountered in rough braking bumps, which led the rear end to kick up a bit.

As always, ergos were great, especially for our taller testers. The roll-on powerband of the bike is amazing, and the newest member of the TWMX staff, Mike Basher, was quoted as saying, "this thing is so ridiculously fast that I can barely hold on down the Glen Helen's start straight. Give me back the '02 CR125!"

Look for a broader and more comprehensive test in the next issue of TWMX.

Mick is right about the SX, but the EXCs are not these upgrades.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Similar Content

    • By Ponch
      I have a 2007 450 EXC that I recently installed a new clutch slave cylinder on. Per the 2007 KTM service manual it clearly states that the clutch needs to be filled with hydraulic oil, which I did (magura blood). That was yesterday. I went out to double check the level today and when I removed the cover, the rubber seal was all contorted and out of shape. I then looked at the cover and it's a Brembo clutch and says "DOT 4 brake fluid only".
      I flushed the line and the master cylinder about 7 times with DOT 4 brake fluid and there was no sign of the magura blood left in the system. My question is: other than the rubber boot on the master cylinder, what damage might have been done by putting in the hydraulic oil? It was in for about 24 hours.
      Thanks in advance for any advice!
    • By pumpernickelBrad
      Hi Folks!

      Sorry if there are a bunch of threads already but I used the site's search function and didn't find anything so far...

      I just found a decent deal on a '14 350 EXC-F with 11k km (unknown hours). Has a few goodies including skid plate, hand guards and it's for sale for about $2k CAD less than a '16 with 6k km on it.
      The bike is in showroom condition (appearance) with no indication it has been offroad at all.

      What would be the gotchas that would make this deal realistic? I'm coming from a WR250R where the engine lasts forever, is 11k street kms high for these bikes? 
      Are there any big defects in the '14s that I haven't dug up yet?
      With no service records what things should be done, checked, etc?
    • By Brannnt
      I purchased an '06 525 EXC some time ago, and recently pulled the motor out of the frame to address some other issues. When I removed the clutch slave cylinder, I noticed an issue the previous owner neglected to tell me about during the purchase.
      It appears that at some point, the chain broke and damaged the engine case near the clutch slave cylinder (see pics, please). I have noticed that the clutch does not fully disengage (bike lurches a bit going into gear, neutral is hard to find... its worse when engine is cold) ... I did not notice any leaks around this area (mineral oil or engine oil) before or during disassembly. 
      The previous owner (or someone) repaired it with some sort of epoxy.
      Without doing my due diligence (checking clutch fluid level, bleeding) I hesitate to state that this is the cause of my clutch disengagement issue ... but pardon my ignorance here and help me out: How bad is this?  Am I looking at replacing my engine case here or is the previous owner's jerry rig good enough?

    • By Black Sox
      Just bought a new 2017 350 excf ,will be doing 98% off road ,ordered skid plate bark busters ,
      my ? Is what's the best easiest way to eliminate rear fender light assembly.I still would like to have a break light.
      xcf fender will fit so dealer says,under $50.00 👍But xcf brake light $125.00 .👎What's the best economical way of doing this?
    • By JNV
      Hi friends from Spain.
      Mi new KTM