Acerbis tank ergonomics?

I did a search, but could not find info on the ergonomics of the Acerbis 4.2 tank. I've read that the clark 3.9 is a little awkward and the IMS 3.2 is good ergonomically... but i'm not sure the 3.2 is enough range. Can anyone comment on the acerbis tank? Is it really wide by the knees compared to stock? Thanks

It is wider than stock, but not too wide IMHO.

i think the clarke is the best it holds 3.9 but i have put 4 full gallons in . plus most of the gas is low for better handling plus it emptys the best you dont have to lean the bike over to get the gas over to the other side i get 180 miles a tank and thats with hard riding . sure it is taller but like me it takes 1 gallon to get were i ride i the hills so buy the time i get there most of the gas is low . plus it goes on easy and you keep the fan . i put mine on in 30mins

thanks for the info guys... I have to admit Im not a huge fan of the clark looks and I've heard it holds the fuel up higher.

Mostly Im just battling between an IMS 3.2 and the Acerbis 4.25, I want the extra capacity of the Acerbis but Im not sure if the size of it will drive me nuts. Is it really alot wider than the IMS or just taller? :thumbsup:

hmmm... clark 3.6... didn't even know about that one. This is getting hard to decide...

hmmm... clark 3.6... didn't even know about that one. This is getting hard to decide...

Bear in mind that the Clarke 3.6 is for the E model, not the S/SM. I just installed that model on my green E (see related post if interested). You didn't say which model you had, IIRC.

Bear in mind that the Clarke 3.6 is for the E model, not the S/SM. I just installed that model on my green E (see related post if interested). You didn't say which model you had, IIRC.

Acerbis is for the E too. Basically you will need to fab your own mounts when you want to put an E spec tank to an S/SM. Maybe relocate the horn and ditch the fan.

Just so you know, the IMS fits both the E and S -no need to remove the horn or fan in case you want to keep them.

That Clarke 3.6 looks great by the way :thumbsup:

I have an S with the clark 3.9. I seriously don't even notice the difference riding it. Carries the fuel up higher but usually my dirt rides use about 2 gal or less so I only put about 3 gal in it so the fuel is the same height as stock. Filler up for extended range of dual sporting / commuting where the weight probably less likely to matter. Got mine new old stock on ebay for $100 and I'm tickled with it. Several aftermarket tanks on Ebay right now I noticed. I love the natural so you can see the fuel level. The natural doesn't look as good down the road but my bike is to ride not show so yes it is scratched and the stickers are gone. Might even be a little dirt on it somewhere. I kinda like the non cluttered without stickers look.

thanks for the info guys. I have an e model by the way and just got it plated for the street. I think im gonna need more capacity over stock. The clarke 3.6 looks like a good choice... the Acerbis just seems a little too big for my tastes.

i think the clarke is the best

I can see adding you opinion for the Clarke.

But how can you make this conclusion?

Do you also own an Acerbis? What about the IMS?

plus most of the gas is low for better handling

Strange, when I rode with one I thought the gas was held much higher then when I rode with the IMS tank.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Similar Content

    • By BikeChimp
      I'd like to turn my UK 2004 DRZ400S back to stock airbox (snorkel) and jets, needle shim position etc
      When I bought it the PO had fitted a Sigma6 kit and done the 3x3 mod but is doesn't have a tapered needle like the JD and other kits. Took me ages to get it running right, however it still runs rich and I'm fed up of arsing around with it. 
      So I've bought a standard airbox without 3x3 hole, stock exhaust.
      Q1 The Suzuki manual says this Mukuni BSR36 (29FA) carb should have a 142.5 Main Jet but the Clymer manual say its a 135.  In UK everything's from sea level to 1000m. I'm in Sheffield so nothing gets above 500m even in the Peaks (Hills). Any UK owners or anyone else know what the correct jet should be?
      Q2 Says the original needle is a '5DH36-2nd'. The needle has 5 notches on it. Currently set at 2 clip from bottom. The Suzuki reference says needle is 5DH36-2nd, Does the 2nd bit mean 2nd from top or bottom?
      Q3 - Does anyone have a detailed photo of the shim order just in case it was assembled wrong. (mine is attached)
      I know most people on here are going to be horrified I'm taking back to stock but any help on above would be really appreciated.

    • By Bgringo
      I've read a lot of threads about this but still haven't found exactly what I'm looking for.  I'm pulling my 2004 DRZ400S out of storage sometime this week and getting it ready for the season.  I live at 9,000 ft, but my first ride of the year is probably going to be at around 5,000 ft.  I was going to pull the 145 main jet I'm running and put in the 150 adjusting the needle from the 2 clip to the 3rd, then re-jet once I got home.  I already have the extended fuel mixture screw in place so I started thinking that I should just run the 150 jet set up and adjust the fuel screw to compensate for the higher elevation where I'll be doing most of my riding.  I will be going down in elevation for rides until late May or June depending on snowfall, but riding on the street when I'm able.  Are there any disadvantages with this?
      I'm new to posting on this forum, so please forgive me if I didn't get the right search words in and there is already a post about this.
    • By Markl5557
      I am currently running 10w 40 Belray non synthetic and I want to switch to full synthetic amsoil .... is it ok to switch from regular to synthetic? I have read it’s not safe to go from synthetic to regular can someone explain if it’s safe to go from regular to synthetic!? Thanks !
    • By RockyMtnMark
      Good Morning,
        Last night I measured my valve clearances for the very first time (I know...) on my DRZ400S.  It's a 2002 and I've owned is since 2011.  I bought it with t's got about 15,000 miles on it and most of it's miles these days are on dirt.
      Intake specs are 0.10-0.20 mm.  Exhaust specs are 0.20-0.30
      My intake valve clearances are in spec, forgot to write them down.  My exhaust valve clearances are between 0.1778 and 0.2032 which is slightly out of spec.  They are no more than 25 microns out of spec.  My question is, do I really need to shim these?  Will this kind of out-of-spec cause performance, mechanical, or other losses?  As far as I can tell, I'd have to buy a whole shim kit which is like $80.  Thanks!
    • By Zach440
      Selling my 2009 Drz400sm. Been a great bike but it’s time to let go . Not looking for any trades - spring is just around the corner ! Located in northern Virginia . Cash only $4200- willing to negotiate I have some wolfman luggage options available as well. Love to make a package deal for someone 

      -11640 miles . Mild off-road never wrecked.
      -Oil / filter changed every 1500 miles
      -New did chain , brake pads , front sprocket at 10400 miles .
      - valves checked and within spec at 10,000
      - jetted with JD kit and 3x3 mod
      -doubletake mirrors
      -waterproof usb wired and located next to Speedo
      - drc large foot pegs , barkbusters with integrated turn signals . 12oclocklabs tall delete with upgraded circuit board
      -thumpertalk case savers
      -sergeant seat (amazing) and Clarke 3.9 tank (190mile range )
      - fog lights wired in so they shut off with high beams
      -Shorai lithium battery
      -led headlight

      - stock gas tank and seat will be included

      The bike is dirty in photos and I apologize my water is currently disabled outside due to freezing temps . Radiator guards and skid plate NOT included but can be for some extra $$. Rear tire could be replaced but front is fine .