The big 3-0 Hp: Crossing the Line!

Hey everyone, Just wanted to let you know that after being so satisfied with my recently big-bored klx which has a muzzy, kustom kraft, kdx snorkel but still stock carb. I decided to up the power some more. I had it dynoed today and i got 27.18 peak hp. I said to the guy who owns my shop that i use " what can I do to make this thing cross the 30 hp threshold. I asked if a pumper carb would increase HP he said no only throttle response. i do plan to get a fcr sometime soon but i want to work on the power first. So he tells me I can go with some hi-po cams and get either a 3 angle or 5 angle valve job. I opted for the 5. This came out to about $1100. This brings my running total up to 9 grand and thats with me doing a lot of the work. Yes, yes I know I could have just bought a ktm or husky but thats not what i want. I want a custom beast that can't be bought, only BUILT. Half the fun for me is watching my bike grow and seeing the looks on others faces. What good is money if you dont spend it? Anyway the guy said this should bring to to around 29.5 to POSSIBLY JUST 30 but I may have to reshape the C Chamber to get any further HP. I said " sh*t, Thats gonna cost me right?" then I realized EURICKA! I left the quiet core in my muzzy! haha so i took that out and the hp went up another .6 so the guy said I should most deffinatly be able to get 30 hp. I am just so excited and wanted to let everyone know. anyone else done a valve job or cams? how'd it work out for ya?

I also have a 331 and have big money in head and valve work along with Web Cam cams. With out a doubt, I would not touch the head until it at least needs valves. IMO, the best and most noticeable improvement to the KLX was the addition of the FCR35. Although it may not add power on the dyno, it will give you the impression that it has and give the biggest WOW factor. I started with a 300 and not a 250. If I had to choose, I would much rather have my 300 with the FCR35 over my 331 with cams and the CVK. The FCR35 and good suspension are the first two major things I would do to a KLX.

Since the CVK34 was used on the original 250 and you are running it on a 330, it seems like a larger carb might get you some power at high revs. The pump would be gravy.

Also seems like you are after bragging rights rather than making your bike better seeing that you are chasing power over rideability.

I won't lie I will enjoy having some bragging rights but i also ride about 80% street. The reason I am holding off on the pumper is because I was told the pumper carb gives big benefits off-road but is not great for street use. Do you guys think i should go with a bill blue mikuni 34 or spend 700 for the bolt on fcr from fsw?

There's been alot of talk about whether or not a pumper carb makes more power or if the throtle response makes it feel that way. That butterfly valve going across the venturi of the cvk is 4 mm wide. If you subtract the cross section of the shaft when the valve is fully open then the cross sectional area of the 34mm carb is only a little more than 31mm. 34mm cirle has a cross sectional area of 907 square mm. 4mm x 34mm = 136 907-136=771 Thats the area of the 34mm carb-771. A 31 mm circle has an area of 754mm. A 35 fcr has 961 square mm. 36mm mikuni has 1017 squre mm. A 37mm fcr has 1074 square mm. The guys that have these carbs think the power is better and the numbers show potential, what do you guys think?

I just put an FCR35 on my bike last week. Thankfully, the guy i bought it from had it tuned perfectly, essentially i bolted it right on. Took it for the first ride Friday night. powerwheelies in the first 3 gears down the side street in front of my house has never happened to me before on my KLX. I also have a larger header, which accounts for the power as well. But i couldn't get the smile off of my face.:lol:

I'd also agree that the pumper-and-pipe and suspension upgrades are the two most worthwhile big dollar improvements to a KLX. If I bored out the bike, I'd be inclined towards a 37mm FCR just to flow a bit more air. There is nothing wrong with the 35mm FCR, and it installs easier, but you may get more performance with the 37.

Well I have always trusted you guys so.... you think I should spring for the fcr 35mm Or just save some money and go with a mikuni/bill blue 34mm. I hear they are both great but the way I see it is since I am already going all out on this bike why skimp on the carb which is supossed to make the " biggest " difference? What are your thoughts?

Also can anyone tell me if the fcr 35 fsw sells is new or used and does is bolt right on or is it very difficult to install?

I'm partial to the FCR35. It is however, substantially more than the Mikuni's. From what I have been told the Mikuni's are much better than the CVK but there is a reason the FCR style carbs are on all the modern bikes. Once dialed in the FCR35 will rip compared to the CVK. Totally transforms the bike the way it should have come from the factory.

Jerry at FSW sells new carbs. He sets them up to be a direct bolt on and the jetting will be very close if not right on. You will have to use a single cable for the throttle. You can use one of the stock cables and throttle or Jerry also sells a single cable and throttle. With the pumper I would also get a hot start. If you go with a carb from FSW he will also drill and tap the carb and set that up as well.

its a shoehorn fit, but mine fit with no cutting of the frame. You also have to shim the back of the gas take with a rubber spacer so the tank does not rub the carb. shows it i believe.

to give you an idea of a proberly tuned carb, yesterday, I walked out into the garage and kicked my bike, with no throttle, started on the second kick. i also have the hot start mod and a 1/4 turn throttle assembly. i used the stock throttle cable, although it needs about 3/4 of an inch of the rubber/plastic and metal insulation cut back, which was harder than it sounds. I'm told when you are riding and it stalls an the bike is hot, to restart do NOT touch the throttle when trying to restart it. kick it and kick it and if it doesn't start, then open the hot start and try. again, my bike starts with no throttle and actually doesn't like any throttle for the first 3 minutes of warm up, bogs it and it stalls. i've not had my bike in the woods yet to try the hot start, still to dang cold and nasty here.

man... I wish I would've posted this thread before I dropped a grand on the valves and cams. But anyway after reading an extensive thread about CK's fcr 37 install I am deffinatly gonna go with a 35 from FSW. Just wanted to ask you guys do you think +75$ for the choke is a must? I know my bike is a pain to start when its cold without the choke on. also, will a hot start fit with the choke version of the carb? anyone buy the choke version or is the regular sufficient? Thanks for all the help guys.

mine does not have a choke, but does have a hot start. so i can't answer if its needed. starting is not a problem, but i keep mine in a garage and the coldest it gets is about 50 degrees.

the valve job you did should help regardless.

The choke is not needed with the FCR35. I give about 3-4 quick twists of the throttle and it fires right up. I've been in temps as low as the teens and had no problems. The hot start is not needed or used for cold starting. It is beneficial after you dump it and it stalls out on you.

This brings my running total up to 9 grand and thats with me doing a lot of the work. Yes, yes I know I could have just bought a ktm or husky but thats not what i want. I want a custom beast that can't be bought, only BUILT.

Good gas for you for building your own bike! I'm doing to the same with my 00 Dr Z400 kicker... Paid $2000 in offroad only trim and over $5k total now! :p pics in garage

Thanks for the encouragement soup I appriciate it. I don't know why some people have to be so negative on here. I try to live by the term "to each his own" because I know a lot of people ride bikes or do things that I myself would neccessarily not do, but I don't judge them on it. We all find happiness on 2 wheels being propeled by engines right? So why hate on someone because their take on it is a little different than yours? So many people curse me ( not so much on TT) but else where online for trying to make my KLX somthing it's not supossed to be. But honestly what truly is a bike SUPOSSED to be anyway? Last time I checked it's a tool used for bringing hapiness and fufillment into someone's life. at least for me....

Hey CRF,

I agree with ya, a bike grows with the ability and personality of the person. My KLX300 was my first dirt bike and in the begining I crashed it a lot so I had to replace some of the stuff and when I did I replaced the parts with nicer components. So much so the last big ride I went on some of the guys that I only ride with once a year thought that I had gotten a new bike! The Stroker susp, and the big bore kit, pumper carb made a huge evolution in what the bike could handle in the desert of southern california!

I am sure that the future holds a lighted version of a 450, but for now the KLX is where it is at for me!


I agree with you 100%! It doesn't matter what you ride.......the only thing that matters is the fact that we ALL RIDE!:ride: Thats why we buy these two-wheeled machines.:p (And to get away from the wife:thumbsup: )

Does anyone know if keihin discontinued making the FCR-MX 35mm carb a.k.a. the one were talking about... I went on their site and I only found info for the 37 and 41 mm's. It seems like from the look of the site that the carb was discontinued. Or maybe it's just much harder to find since very few bikes use it due to most motocrossers being eith 250s and 450's and the 35mm venturi size is not common? anyone help me out here just wonderin'?

Check with for their part number 016.693


It is a 35mm FCR for Suzuki DR350. It MIGHT be the one.

Ride on


Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Similar Content

    • By PigPenKLX450
      I bought my KLX in June of this year and this pic was taken earlyer this year I kept forgetting to post it. picture was taken in dove springs. to the left is jawbone cyn way down below and to the right is dove springs. I have gotten many many compliments on how good this photo came out I thought I would share it with all of you.

    • By STi21
      Well, here we go again.
      We had previously posted our Fork Conversion How-To here on ThumperTalk, hoping to help out anyone looking to upgrade their KLX140 or KLX140L by installing a set of KX85 or KX100 Forks. Our goal was to use 100% factory OE parts. No aftermarket anything. And we accomplished that goal. The Bike is drastically improved.
      But it just didn't seem complete. We wanted to finish the job with a new take-off rear KX100 Shock. Don't get me wrong, the KLX140L's rear Shock is actually pretty good. But it is a bit short on travel and refinement. So off we went to eBay to purchase a new take-off rear KX100 Shock. (For the record, the KX85 and KX100 rear Shocks are identical in every way.)
      We would be remiss not to credit art5, codious13 and a few others here on TT for their help and inspiration. A big thank you, guys.
      In order to make sure that anyone and everyone would be comfortable with this conversion, we took lots of pictures and measurements to help make this easy for folks to follow along.
      Here we have our KLX140L with the KX100 front Forks already installed per our previous post. (Eagle-eyed readers will notice that the Bike at this point has KLX140 14"/17" Wheels on it. We have since switched back to the KLX140L's 16"/19" Wheels.) Here we are, ready to go under the knife again:

      We removed the Seat, Plastics and Airbox, and then unbolted the rear Shock. Pictures are worth a thousand words, so here it is:

      Some interesting observations can be found when comparing the KLX140L Shock versus the KX100 Shock.
      First off, the KLX140L OE Spring rate is 5.0kg/mm and the KX100 OE Spring rate is 4.7kg/mm. We stuck with the softer KX100 OE Spring, but a heavier or more aggressive rider may want to re-use the KLX140L Spring.
      Second, the stock Spring pre-load on the KLX140L was measured to be about 80mm. The stock Spring pre-load on the KX100 was measured to be about 70mm. This is measured from the top of the Spring to the center of the top Shock mounting hole. (We ended up staying with the KLX140L's 80mm setting.)
      Third, KLX140L's Shock body is about 35mm longer than the KX100's Shock body. Here is where we find our additional three inches or so of suspension travel.
      Fourth, the KLX140L's Clevis is about 20mm longer than the KX100's Clevis. Not good. We did not want to drop the rear end of the Bike down, so we'll have to install the KLX140L's Clevis onto the KX100 Shock.
      Lastly, the KLX140L's External Reservoir is significantly shorter than the KX100's External Reservoir. Again, not good in this instance. As it stands, it is going to hit the KLX140L's Frame. More on this later:

      Using a Center Punch, Hammer and a Spanner Wrench, we loosened the threaded Spanner Lock Ring and Perch as far as they would go, and then removed the Springs from the Shocks. Nothing to it. Here is the KLX140L's Shock with the Spring removed:

      At this point we needed to switch out the KXL140's Clevis with the KX100's Clevis. The KLX140L's Clevis Bolt is pictured here:

      By simply putting a wrench on both the Clevis Bolt and the Clevis itself, we removed the Clevis from both Shocks:

      Now here was a potential concern. We did not know exactly how the Clevis' adjustment mechanism (AKA Clickers) is attached to the bottom of the Shock's center shaft. We have heard that the Shock can be damaged at this point, so we were very careful during this next step.
      It turns out (Pun intended) that there is a center rod that extends down into the Clevis in order to adjust the Shock's rebound dampening. If this center rod is allowed to slide out, and it did try to, the Shock may discharge and need servicing.
      That being said, just make sure that the center rod stays relatively static during the changeover. No worries here:

      And now we have a KX100 Shock complete with a KLX140L Clevis:

      Now, here things get a bit more interesting. How to get the KX100 Shock to fit into the KLX140L's Frame? Looking at the Frame's rear top Shock Mount, we can see that there is a threaded Collar welded to the Frame. This Collar has a 10mm ID, a 16mm OD and is 20mm long:

      We installed the KX100 Shock into the Bike, but did not install the top Shock Mount Bolt. Not surprisingly, there is a fair amount of bearing free-play in the Shock's lower UNI-TRAK suspension mechanism. Without putting any significant lateral pressure on the Shock, we tilted it to the left, and took some measurements:

      And then we tilted it to the right, and took some measurements:

      There was an easy 16mm of side-to-side play at the top of the Shock. Perfect. If we ground 8mm off the threaded Collar, the Shock should fit perfectly. After covering the Carburetor's intake with Tin Foil in order to keep any debris out, the careful use of an Angle Grinder and/or Dremel Tool was all that was needed. A bit of hand filing at the end is wise to ensure everything is just right:

      Obviously, we now had 8mm of space to the left of the Shock's top mount. What to do here without going aftermarket? Not a problem at all. We removed the two dust seals from the top of the now unused KLX140L Shock and slid out the center Collar. This Collar has a 10mm ID, a 16mm OD and is 19mm long. Again, perfect:

      Using a Dremel Tool, we cut the Collar in half. This way, if we goofed up and ground one of the halves a bit too short, we would have a backup:

      Using a Bench Grinder, we ground down one of the Collar halves to exactly 8mm:

      And finally, the moment of truth. We installed the KX100 Shock with our new 8mm matching Collar and torqued everything down per the specs in the Owner's Manual. The triangular UNI-TRAK Link at the base of the Shock was flipped over and ground down just a bit, as needed, per art5's recommendation. The flipped Link raises the rear of the Bike about one inch and stiffens up the rear suspension a bit. The Link is not visible in this picture, but you get the idea:

      Another view from the left side:

      This picture shows everything in it's place:

      And there you have it. So far, the Bike feels spectacular. Very smooth, very plush and very fun. And everything looks absolutely 'factory'. Awesome.
      Even though we only moved the top Shock mounting point 8mm to the right, well within the lower bearing's range of free-play, we will keep an eye on the bearings to make sure they are not wearing prematurely over the coming years. They are cheap to replace, if need be.
      It would be surprising if tilting the Shock over a mere 1.1458 Degrees will really have any negative impact. Again, no worries. Finally, here is the completed package:

      By the way, we are not trying to take credit here and pretend that we're the first people to put a KX100 Shock on a KLX140L. We're not. We just hope that this helps anyone out there, especially folks who might feel a bit intimidated by this process, to do the same thing if they would like to. It's really not that difficult. Have fun...
      Erik (and my now 14 year old son Tyler)
    • By v55
      Hi Everyone,
      Firstly, good morning. Let me introduce myself: I'm French and I live there. I think there is the better forum for technical issue in the world and would like to find a solution.
      Here is my problem:
      I have a '2009 KLXR, and the surface of the cylinder head which support camshaft (on the right side of the engine) where there is not bearing, is destroyed. Due to that there is a clearance between camshaft and head. I change two times cylinder head and still same issue!
      I'm disappointed! Does someone has the same problem? In your opinion it's due to what? And how to fix it?
      Apologise for my english!) If it is not clear i can join a pic.
      Thank you!
    • By Nick Gavrilis
      Hi everyone, here's my (rookie) dilemma. If you had 1000€ (1.293,551$) and no more, which one of these two bikes would you choose to buy and restore up to the point of being able to trail ride on the weekends? the 4T has 21.000 miles on it and the 2T has 12.000 miles (daily commuting is not an issue here, pure fun and learning how to cope with a dirt bike is, but on a tight budget ) Also any thoughts on reliability, cheap maintenance etc, would be appreciated or if someone has another bike to suggest that suits better for the job i would be more than happy to know about it. Thanx a lot!
      p.s. thumper talk rules!
    • By MostWanted117
      I have a cr85 and i have had it for a few years now. my uncle says that he wants me to get a more reliable bike. there have been a lot of options but I have narrowed down to the klx140l. I have been doing some research and found that the cr has about 10-15 more horsepower than the klx. this got me worried because I don't really want a bike that is any slower. I am sick of finishing the ride early because there is always something wrong with it. I don't know if I should keep the cr or get a more reliable bike and have longer rides.
      could people please give reasons why they think whatever they were thinking. don't just say things like " go the klx" or "the cr is way better".
      could people also bring up any other bikes that could be good ( don't want a cheap Chinese bike)
      I am 5'2 and weigh about 45-50kg ( 100-110 pounds)
      I do decent and long trail bike riding