Utah Off-Road Vehicle Suit Revived


Utah Off-Road Vehicle Suit Revived

Federal Appeals Court Revives Lawsuit to Close Parts of Utah Wilderness to Off-Road Vehicles

D E N V E R, Aug. 30 — A lawsuit seeking to close some proposed wilderness areas in Utah to off-road vehicles was revived Thursday when the 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals sent the issue back to a lower court.

The three-judge panel said in a split decision that the federal court in Utah erred when it decided it lacked the jurisdiction to order the U.S. Bureau of Land Management to close the roads.

The judges also rejected the BLM's arguments about the scope of its discretion under federal wilderness laws and its assertion that courts don't have jurisdiction over the agency's daily decisions.

The appeals court, however, stressed that its decision was narrow, focused mainly on whether the U.S. District Court in Utah can get involved in the dispute. The appeals court did not address whether allowing off-road vehicle use will harm the proposed wilderness areas.

The Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance, The Wilderness Society and six other groups sued in 1999, claiming the BLM failed to protect the proposed wilderness areas when it allowed off-road vehicles on the sites.

The sites have been declared eligible to be federal wilderness areas. Under federal law, they must be managed as if they were official wilderness areas until Congress decides what to do with them.

Motor vehicles, development and other activities are off-limits in wilderness areas.

In 2000, U.S. District Judge Dale Kimball refused to close the sites to the vehicles and dismissed the lawsuit.

In a separate opinion, Judge Monroe McKay said the district court lacked jurisdiction in the dispute but environmental laws allow the groups to pursue their claims through the public comment process.

Here we go again. Utah has some spectacular riding and it would be a shame if more areas are closed. I hope Moab and surrounding areas aren't part of this would-be federal wilderness area.

Originally posted by ddialogue:

Here we go again. Utah has some spectacular riding and it would be a shame if more areas are closed. I hope Moab and surrounding areas aren't part of this would-be federal wilderness area.

I think part of the area in question is the San Rafael Swell. The WSA in that area is closing around 60% of the available riding. This area is gorgeous and if you haven't been, start planning your trip before it's all closed.


Typical BLM move of late. They declare land closed to off-road use despite the fact that they have no funding, no additional personnel, no idea what they are doing, and use the excuse that they are "erring on the side of caution". They start with no evidence or shaky evidence, just an assertion by extreme enviros of what horrors will allegedly happen if vehicles continue to use the area. Then they take a huge leap of logic to blame the vehicles and humans for everything that's not to their arbitrary standards (whether valid or not). Then declare that if they could just eliminate all vehicles and humans, all the problems will go away.

Fact is, our presence as humans saves more species than the Endangered Species Act (no contest since the ESA has NEVER SAVED ONE SINGLE SPECIES). Collectively, over 30 years, our activities as off-roaders haven't impacted the landscape a fraction as much as the wildfires we have experienced in just the last 12 months. And guess whose policies are to blame for those??? Yep, the same people who are telling the BLM that we're at fault.

Join BRC, Corva, ARRA, ORBA, etc.


Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now