Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  

Colorado Lost Trail?

Recommended Posts

What/where is the Lost Trail. I have been searching around here and google and i have found a few references for West Lost Trail, North Lost Trail etc but nothing talks about where it is, maybe thats why its lost??

Anyone have any info/details/pics on it? I have heard some people say that it is a pretty intense trail, not real long, just technical and connects to a few other trails.

Thanks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Lost Creek trail? It's in the Lost Creek wilderness area, where we used to be able to ride.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think there is a lost trail on the West side of the S Platte N of Lake George. You may want to hit up Pablo83 on that one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Lost trail creek and west lost trail creek are in the Rio Grande NF above Rio Grande Reservior northwest of Creede. Trail 821 and 822. Other trails in the area, 917, 916, 787 and joining trails in the San Juan NF are still listed as open on the current MVUM plan. It's been several years since I rode these but they were great.

Link to MVUM:

http://www.fs.fed.us/r2/riogrande/recreation/travel_management/mvumindex.shtml

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It's been several years since I rode these but they were great.

]

"Were" might be the word: Pole Creek Trail, and West Lost Ck Trails are in Handies Peak Wilderness proposal, part of Diana DeGette's Colorado Wilderness Act - 850,000 acres, not one of which is in her district.

DeGette's Act:

http://degette.house.gov/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=844&Itemid=189

Handies Peak info:

http://www.canyoncountrywilderness.org/handiespeak.htm

"Lost" just might be the word too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It seems that everyday someone is trying to take more "public land" from the "public". Every wilderness bill does just that, effectivly closing it to the vast majority of the public. I live in the upper Rio Grande area so these trails are in my backyard, so to speak. I just read that Congessman John Salazar, I live in his district, came out in opposition to HR 4289. I sent an e-mail thanking him for his position on this bill. I hope his opposition will carry over to others.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The West Lost Trail and North Lost Trail are not near here (WP). If you're looking for the Lost Trail that's close to us, it's out near Tarryall. It's a pass over the Puma Hills, just like LaSalle Pass. It runs slightly north of LaSalle. It connects trail 231 on the east to trail 237.A (I think this is also referred to as 237.A1) on the west.

The trail is perfectly named as it is difficult to find. I assume it's named after the Lost Creek Wilderness Area, althought it is a good bit south of that area. It is shown on the most detailed USGS quads. It is also shown on older CO altlases and on Garmin's City Navigator software (both of which are street maps, not trail maps). It is not on most trail maps like Trails Illustrated or the official Forest Service maps.

It is very difficult to find. I went out searching for it the first time and could not find it. I talked to Will in town and he assured me it existed so I went out a second time and once again could not find it. I went a third time with GPS tracks and finally located it. This was last spring.

It was an basicly an unmaintained goat trail that was stupid steep in tight trees with an impossibily sharp switchback. It also had downed trees that in order to get over I had to lay my bike down on the tree trunk and drag it over. It is so steep it can only be reasonably navigated from east to west. That was early June 09.

A few months later when we did BreckTrek, Lost Trail had a wooden cattle guard installed up top, the downed trees had been cleared, and the trail had been widened to a quad track (yet still steep enough to provide a good challenge). The wierd thing was that now trail 237.A (where you exit Lost Trail) had a No OHV sign.

The legality of Lost Trail is questionable. It is not an official FS OHV trail, yet it has recently been improved. While trail 237.A is an official FS OHV trail, yet it has a No OHV sign.

Lost Trail is so difficult to find that I wonder if I've been getting lost (no pun intended) on it which is why I end up crossing the No OHV sign. I plan to scout it again as soon as the snow clears.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

West Lost Trail Creek was open last summer.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks everyone, and Pablo, that is the trail i was talking about. I figured you would chime in. Is this trail going to be a part of the RMMB500 or the Breck Trek?

Anyone have any pics of the trail?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Lost trail is not in the MB500. I would like it to be in BreckTrek, but it needs to be scouted farther to find a clean way out first. As stated earlier, there is now a No OHV sign at the exit.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Other than BreckTrek, have you heard anyone else talk about Lost Trail? I discoved it by studying maps. And Will (in town) also knew about it. I've showed it to two other people (although I doubt either could find it again). Outside of that group I've never met anyone who was aware it existed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Anyone have any pics of the trail?

No Pics but I do have some tree bark and dirt from it. :banana:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
No Pics but I do have some tree bark and dirt from it. :banana:

So, Randy, do you think you could find that trail on your own?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
So, Randy, do you think you could find that trail on your own?

Are you kidding? I can barely find 717. :banana:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Reply with:

Sign in to follow this  

  • Similar Content

    • By 99klr250
      We'll be returning to Moab to ride.  One area we have not tried is Klondike Bluffs.  Has anybody ridden there?  Do you recommend?  Any favorites trails?  Thanks
    • By J.P.C.
      2014 New Edition KLR650
      Ridden mostly on-road commuting to work.
       
      5900 miles (will increase as I am still riding it)
      Thermo bob 2
      EM Doo hickey & torsion spring
      JNS skid plate
      SW Motech crash bars
      SW Motech center stand
      Moose luggage racks
      Pelican 1550 cases with Caribou case liners
      MadStad windscreen
      LeoVince exhaust
      Pro taper evo handlebars 
      Uni air filter
      Touratech headlight guard 
      HTP master cylinder guard
      New Bridgestone Trail Wing tires
      LED dash lights
      Aprilia mirrors
      Top gun 7.4kg rear shock spring
      Jetted for 8000 ft altitude (140 main)
       
      Extra Parts included:
      Stock Exhaust
      Stock Tires (only approx 200 miles on these before I changed them)
      Stock Windscreen
      Stock Hand guards
      Stock Skid plate
      Stock Mirrors
      16t sprocket
      Stock Rear shock spring
      Carb jets: 138, 142.5, 145
       
      Bike has been taken care of. Only damage is 2 small scratches on tank from leaning against it with belt buckle. Has been stored outside, but covered.
    • By NPWR250
      Does anyone have the individual trail lenghts of trails in the popular Moab ares...
      Sand Flats, White Wash, Sovereign, Prichett Canyon/Kane creek, Poison Spider/ Gemini Bridges areas.
      Trying to figure out a fuel statagey. We will be trailering to the differnt trail heads each day.
      2 of the bikes only have a 60 mile range


      Thanks, Shawn
    • By cjjeepercreeper
      WYOMING - Teton County Commissioners Meeting on Wyoming Public Lands Initiative
      Dear Action Alert Subscriber,
      We just received an urgent alert from one of our Wyoming partners, Advocates for Multi-Use of Public Lands (AMPL) asking for our help to get the word out regarding the upcoming Teton County Commissioners meeting on the Wyoming Public Lands Initiative (WPLI). This meeting takes place Tuesday, October 9, 2018, at 9:00 am in the BCC chambers at 200 South Willow Street, Jackson, Wyoming. Your help is needed on this extremely urgent issue. TAKE ACTION NOW!
      We've pasted AMPL's alert below. Please take a minute to read the email, take action and then pass this along to friends, family and riding buddies.
      Thanks in advance and, as always, if you have any questions or concerns, please contact BRC.
      Ric Foster
      Policy Director
      Sharetrails.org/BlueRibbon Coalition
      208-237-1008 ext. 2
      CALL TO ACTION!
      Teton County WPLI Process: We Need Your Voice!
      Our Teton County Commissioners are holding the final public hearing to vote on the land use designations of the Palisades and Shoal Creek WSA's, and more of your public lands next week. The Commissioners have taken the fate of the WPLI (Wyoming Public Land Initiative) into their own hands, and are voting on whether or not to create 173,000 new acres of new Wilderness, make the Shoal Creek WSA a Wilderness area and keep the Palisades in a WSA.  This proposal would END ACCESS to over 1/3 of the remaining lands in Teton County open to snowmobiling, mountain biking and dirt biking. This meeting takes place Tuesday, October 9th at 9am in the BCC chambers at 200 South Willow Street.  We need you to attend this meeting, write your Commissioners and to show your support AGAINST this new proposal. 
       
      In August the WPLI, a board of volunteers, appointed by the County Commissioners, took three proposals to a vote. These proposals and the resulting vote was the culmination of over two years of hard work by all these dedicated individuals. Ultimately no consensus was met, but the three proposals showed collaboration and transparency by the different user groups' goals and objectives.  
      The WPLI was formed by a charter as a state initiative enacted by the WCCA (Wyoming County Commissioners Association). That charter states that a 100% consensus had to be met to determine the fate of the Wilderness Study Areas in the affected counties. Since the Teton County WPLI did not reach a consensus, our Commissioners created new rules to try to reach a decision. Our Commissioners enacted that if the committee voted in favor on a proposal by a 2/3 majority, the Commissioners would then take that proposal forward to a vote and if passed would present it to the WCCA. So, since the August WPLI vote, the Commissioners have a new proposal; that proposal got the exactly 2/3 majority vote from the special interest conservation stacked 18 member WPLI board last week. This proposal is an entirely different proposal than the three proposals that the WPLI put forth to a vote in August.  
      Our Commissioners are disregarding the public process of the WPLI and re-writing rules to push forth their agenda to close your public lands to mechanized and motorized recreation access. Next week's meeting is a critical time to make your voice heard - as this meeting is where the BCC will vote on whether or not to advance the final proposal that received exactly a 2/3 support from the committee but zero support from the mechanized or motorized representatives.  This proposal creates 173,000 new acres of Wilderness, makes the Shoal Creak WSA a new Wilderness and leaves the Palisades as a WSA.
      Highlights of the new WPLI proposal:
      •     Would result in the largest loss of Teton County Multi-Use land in 34 years, and would shut out mechanized and motorized recreation on 173,000 acres.
      •     Leaves the Palisades as a Wilderness Study Area, which keeps the door open for conservation groups to continue to sue the BTNF to push out user groups, such as snowmobiling and mountain biking.
      •     Turns the Shoal Creek WSA into Wilderness, thus closing it to snowmobiling, dirt biking and mountain biking access.
      •     Closes over 100,000 acres of popular cross-country snowmobile terrain in the Mt. Leidy area.
      •     Creates in total 173,000 acres of new Wilderness in Teton County.  
      •     Leaves 71,000 acres in Wilderness Study Areas instead of trying to designate productive uses for these "temporary" designations, which have been in place for over 34 years.  
      What to do? We need your voice!  
      Please email your commissioners at commissioners@tetoncountywy.gov that you are not in favor of this new proposal and mark your calendars to show up Tuesday, October 9th 9:00 am in the BCC chambers.  
      Here are some talking points to send your commissioners:
      •      I am not in favor of the new WPLI proposal you are putting forth to vote next week.  This proposal closes off access to lands that I value for multi-use recreation: including mountain biking, dirt biking and snowmobiling.
      •      I find value personally, for our local and state economy and local businesses to keep these lands open to mechanized and motorized recreational opportunities.  
      •     82% of the public lands in Teton County are already protected and closed to motorized and mechanized recreation. I want to keep the remaining public lands in Teton County open for snowmobiling, mountain biking and dirt biking.
    • By SnowMule
      Colorado Snowmobile Expo is this weekend at the National Western complex.  (Snowbikes too!)
      https://www.cosnowmobileexpo.com/
      Tickets are $10 at the door, $8 on the website, or print the one-dollar-off coupon to use at the door if you don't want to buy online.
      Vendor booths, product demos, free workshops, pro-rider meet-and-greet. 
      I'll be there with the Tyler's Backcountry Awareness crew all weekend, stop by and check out the new avalanche gear/equipment, try your skills at beacon rescue. 
      Also giving a workshop saturday afternoon on radio communications in the backcountry. 
       
×