Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  

Simons smart body, 4-6 hp increase??

Recommended Posts

A throttelbody with a slide design instead of the butterfly valve version. Up to 6 hp more!?? Sounds too good to be true, but if it is it would be a great investement with a pricetag at 550$. What do you think, true or false ?

http://www.dirtbikemagazine.com/ME2/dirmod.asp?sid=&nm=&type=news&mod=News&mid=9A02E3B96F2A415ABC72CB5F516B4C10&tier=3&nid=0FCE003F2B3A4BF69C5D2D5E8F3C037C

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's true. Adding a FCR carb back onto the FI bikes has added up to 4HP by just doing that, so the SSB seems to be just a well functioning and efficient TB.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good luck on this thread. I posted this about a month ago and it seemed like no one was even interested. I agree with you, that a slide type throttle body would be the ticket for these FI bikes. But I have to admit that the guys website did suck, and still does, but his system could be very good, and for the price of a silencer slip on! Maybe this is what the FI bikes with the limited top end needed. I look foward to more tests on this system, especially for the track. The link you found is a lot better than his website, so maybe some of the guys will be more interested.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would like to mention, in case anyone missed it, in that ad it says "they cant wait to test it"

so they obviously havnt tested it yet.. and who knows, maybe they wont he be happy with it and have a ton of complaints? just something to consider....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Santan 9 in case you missed it, they said they had already tested the prototype and were very happy with the performance of it. But then again maybe they wont like the new version. I just always thought that a slide type throttle body would work so much better, so I was stoked to hear about this, and that it supposedly worked better.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Very interesting and trick lookin' piece. I look forward to seeing the results of more in depth testing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If the magazines gives this thing "thumbs up" after a real test, i can imagine this will be a huge sales success! But why dont the factory teams allready have the slide version? Surely the factory R&D guys must have known this would be more effective when they started working with efi systems?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You would think so, I would have to see some non ad money sponsored dynos and real people testing before I would hop onto this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's about damn time one came out!

Me and a few guys have discussed the need for this..and wondered why the manufacturer used a butterfly.

Only thing we figured was manfacturing costs.

I am sure it's an awesome product and cant wait till it's for more models.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When they dynoed the standard throttlebody with the fmf system, was it remapped then or was it not? If not, that test is not really fair, a standard mapping with an aftermarket exshaust system wouldn´t run that much better on a dyno than a stock exshaust would it?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i came very close to having one bolted on yesterday. Dave was testing with Dirt Bike at Glen Helen Thursday and he offered to meet me at Racetown yesterday. He said he would put it on, and if i liked it i would buy it, if i didnt he would put it back to stock. This is a kx450 btw. I decided with an important race coming up next week to wait and see someone non biased test and endorse it. Bobby Bonds ran one at Pheonix and ran out of gas in something like 45 minutes with an IMS tank, not good. I cant afford to have that happen. When i see the top teams, not magazines, run them, i will be sold.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Im really interested in these.Sounds like a great idea but I dont like that fact that they had to add the FMF pipe in the dyno comparison.Once I see a few more tests on them then I will be convinced.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I posted about this in the YZ450F forum some time ago. The response was not overwelming. The reason people aren't too wild about this is that the gains they talk about are at mid-throttle openings (like Boyeson and Scary Fast carbs wings). While this is nice, the rider could just open the throttle wider. On a dyno, only wide open throttle settings matter. Also while considering the slide vrs. butterfly, the larger opening in the butterfly throttle body makes up for the butterfly being in the air stream. Injectioneering has a mod that smooths the first 1/4 throttle opening of the butterfly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i have been experimenting with the TBs im making new butter flys and cutting the angle to 8* instead of 10* letting the plate stand up straighter in the bore what this does is gives less plate area opening for the same throttle movement you also close the plate down futher with the adjustment screws and have to re adjust your tp sensor a hole needs to be drilled or your air bypass adjustment will be maxed out to get it to idle . i have also shaped the plates and shaft to give considerably more flow for example the honda TB goes from 396 cfm to 460 cfm with the same plate the only thing i have not done is flow the TB with out the shaft and plate to se how eficent my butterfly mods are.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow Ron, awsome as usual. These FI bikes have interesting potential. I don't know how those flow rates compare to the old carbs. I imagine some reprogramming of the fuel would be in order for the 16% increased airflow at wide open. I don't know if that's within the injector's capability. Although I now have a 2010 YZ450F as my primary bike, I stop in here to see what's going on. Since so many of the FI bikes use the same injector, work in this area will benefit all of them (and the developer's wallet).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
i have been experimenting with the TBs im making new butter flys and cutting the angle to 8* instead of 10* letting the plate stand up straighter in the bore what this does is gives less plate area opening for the same throttle movement you also close the plate down futher with the adjustment screws and have to re adjust your tp sensor a hole needs to be drilled or your air bypass adjustment will be maxed out to get it to idle . i have also shaped the plates and shaft to give considerably more flow for example the honda TB goes from 396 cfm to 460 cfm with the same plate the only thing i have not done is flow the TB with out the shaft and plate to se how eficent my butterfly mods are.

Are you still using your intake reducer with these mods?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Reply with:

Sign in to follow this  

  • Similar Content

    • By 33KTM350
      I just bought a Magura hydraulic clutch for my 2014 CRF450R.  Bought it thinking install would be easy, and I'm not sure that's the case now that I have the product in my hands.  I have searched the forums, YouTube, etc for install help specifically for my model year (2013 and 2014 are same really), and haven't found anything specific for the 2013-2014 model install at all.  Instructions from Magura are TERRIBLE, and are not specific at all to the Honda - generic instructions - so I'm debating if I want to return the product, cuz I don't want trouble or a big install job.  Question: for the 2013-2014 CRF450R install ONLY of a Magura Hymec hydraulic clutch - other model years are different and thus it won't be helpful for other model years - do you have any tips or feedback?  My concerns are below...
      1.  The 2014 model has a sleeve behind the clutch actuation arm that the Magura clutch slave cylinder fits into.  Stock, the sleeve holds one end of the cable, with a nut on the other end to keep the cable end tight in the sleeve.  The Magura slave cylinder, however, slides into the mounting sleeve  - but does NOT have a nut: the tension from the clutch actuation arm pulling on the metal Magura slave cyl tip end is apparently supposed to keep the Magura slave cylinder tight in the mounting sleeve.  Q: Will the Magura slave fit in to the mounting sleeve easily, stay tight, and is there any adjustment needed in order to keep the 4-6mm of freeplay that Magura recommends?  How easy is it to get the Magura slave fitted into the sleeve and the metal tip in place?  Is there enough freeplay between slave and tip end to mount in actuating arm AND the holding sleeve, so that the holding sleeve doesn't need to be unbolted?  
      2. The stock clutch cable and OEM setup runs out of the mounting sleeve (see pics marked "metal starts", and then runs through a metal sleeve that routes the cable through the engine compartment - keeping the cable away from the hot parts of the engine case, so as not to melt the cable insulation (I believe).  That metal sleeve is about 6-8 inches in length.  The Magura clutch cable, on the other hand, exits the Magura slave cylinder at an angle - yet has no such metal routing.  I don't think the OEM metal routing sleeve will accept the Magura cable either, so a) the OEM metal routing sleeve would have to be removed first before installing the Magura - and then b) you have to hope that the Magura cable can be routed in such a way with zip ties holding the hydraulic line that line will not touch or be close to the hot metal engine casing as you route it through the engine.  Q: how easy was it to get the OEM clutch cable and metal routing sleeve out?  Easy as unscrewing the nut on the other end of the OEM cable, on the other side of the black rubber cable flange in my pics?   
      3.  My stock clutch pull isn't bad.  I just like the feel of a hydro clutch.  Any feedback on how much better feeling and easier pull will be with the Magura?  What's your feedback on the difference?  FYI, I'm leaving my clutch plates and springs stock.    
       




    • By Eric Blasiman
      We have a 2016 CRF450R with about 11 hours out. never ridden hard always check the oil and change when needed along with the air filter. Took care of the recall that was required as well. Well when riding the bike was stalled out. Went to try and kick start the bike again. the kick start lever just back up jamming my knee into the handle bars and some how ended up cracking the case right by where the kick start goes through the case. Has any one had this happen or heard of this happening? What is the cause? 
    • By crfjunky1320
      Any advice on what should be replaced while I have the top end off for a valve replacement. Will do headgasket and springs of course, anything other parts you would recommend while I'm going at it?
       
      Thanks!
    • By Ron Whitfeld
      The dirtbike is on it's forth year right now on the same motor job. I have to jump start it. Is it worth me trading for a 2009 650 brute force with7000 miles? Need some expert advice. Thanks 
    • By Lucas Hansen
      Just wondering what you guys do to remove black marks on your seat. My 08 crf450r has the red/black seat, and after each ride there are some black marks on the red from my riding pants. Not scuff marks, more like patches of black residue from my pants rubbing on the seat. I’ve tried the magic eraser which seemed to do the trick, but lately they seem like they aren’t coming off. Also tried scrubbing bubbles with a brush and no luck. Not too worried cuz I have an spare OEM seat, but I’d like to keep this one nice. Any ideas? Maybe I shouldn’t wear black pants?
×