Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  

crf 250 2010 suspension issues

Recommended Posts

I recently bought a crf 250 2010. I really like the way the engine performs, but not happy with the suspension:foul:.

Forks works very well in the fast sections of the track with small bumps:ride:.

But not when hitting the medium sized bumps. I can't really say if the forks dive to low in every bump, but I think so.

In small fast bumps the forks, as I said, have a good grip, but the rear feels a bit bumpy. I notised a small improvement by clicking the rebound clicker in 3 clicks from what the book suggest, and the LS compression clicker out 2 clicks.

I'm 82kg in my gear, and a intermediate rider....

Shock is stock everything and sag is 105mm

Forks are 0,45Nm springs (stock 0,44), oil ammount 330ml and revalved this way...

16-32.1 (5 removed, I think)

30.1

28.1

26.1

24.1

22.1

20.1

18.1

16.1

8-14.2

4-12.2 (Must be added to prevent the nut from bottoming?)

Base Plate: 20mm x 1.65mm

4-12.2

Mid

Comp

4-20.1 (one added)

18.1

16.1

14.1

12.1

11.1

2-11.3

2-17.3

Reb (stock)

4-20.1

12.1

20.1

18.1

16.1

14.1

2.12.2

Any ideas just by looking at the shim stacks?

Mr P

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

sounds like too much weight on front wheel , some use a lowering link on the rear of the 250 to stop this , you could go up a rate in springs in the forks , what's your free sag on the rear and try to measure for sag as well , with the extra shim on the mid and softer base it should not blow through the stroke

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

we are testing one today. the rider will be adding a link to the rear. sdi makes one, and so does pro circuit, fc and so on.

we tightened up the float to .15

that bike really was like a stink-bug. we ran the same sag 105, then 108. the rider swapped out springs. he's running .46kg's up front, and a 4.9 in the back.

sag numbers are within the spec we like to see.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I measured the sag again after posting the thread.

Actual sag was 99/28, changed to 105/31 now, maby I should go with a 5,0 rear spring?

Mr P

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
we are testing one today. the rider will be adding a link to the rear. sdi makes one, and so does pro circuit, fc and so on.

we tightened up the float to .15

that bike really was like a stink-bug. we ran the same sag 105, then 108. the rider swapped out springs. he's running .46kg's up front, and a 4.9 in the back.

sag numbers are within the spec we like to see.

What means tighten up the float? And how do that affect the damping?

Mr P

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
What means tighten up the float? And how do that affect the damping?

Mr P

More than likely the float was tightened with that added 20.1 to the mid valve.

Your valving looks close and that 20.1 in the mid was a must do.

You need a rear link. Start with 340CC... then add to control bottoming if needed. Set clickers at C5-10 R10.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

when adding shims under the clamp try to make them bigger than the clamp, its unlikely the 14.2(*) are bending but you dont want variables, you could put the 32.1(5) there instead.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The faster the rider, the stiffer front springs I have been running than "normal".

And on all bikes i lower the rear internally 3mm.

Sag around 105.

One example is a local A rider I am running .50 front fork springs he only weighs 170 with no gear...so clearly a little on the stiffer side of normal - but prior with .47s and stiff valving it was not enough. This way we could back down a tad bit on the valving and still hold up the front end under heavy braking.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the stiffer fork springs do help with the braking for sure. when i first got a hold of this bike and tested the springs, i couldn't believe they were .45's.

the float was the only thing i changed at the time of the spring swap.

too windy for track yesterday, we are hoping to test this week.:smirk:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

have you used the nylon spacers at the bottom of the tube? i have found them in some sets. could be used to help spring twist? they were about 2mm thick.

the springs i got from diverse did have some added preload spacers.

i had a set of the tunable spring seats from sdi, and installed them as well. drilled out for the fast mx specs. they're much shorter than the nationals you find in the pc stuff.

i used 350cc of oil.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

:smirk:

have you used the nylon spacers at the bottom of the tube? i have found them in some sets. could be used to help spring twist? they were about 2mm thick.

the springs i got from diverse did have some added preload spacers.

i had a set of the tunable spring seats from sdi, and installed them as well. drilled out for the fast mx specs. they're much shorter than the nationals you find in the pc stuff.

i used 350cc of oil.

on my forks, i use pvc tubes instaed the stock spring seat stopp.

so its easy to change the preload and i can run different springs (longer KXF Springs etc.)

on the KYB Forks its a bearing on the bottom for the spring twist.

do not use spacers on the top of the Spring (Oilflow!)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
:smirk:

on my forks, i use pvc tubes instaed the stock spring seat stopp.

so its easy to change the preload and i can run different springs (longer KXF Springs etc.)

on the KYB Forks its a bearing on the bottom for the spring twist.

do not use spacers on the top of the Spring (Oilflow!)

Depends on the spacer - the ones he mentions are above the small DIA of the spring seat - aka no added restriction.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

you could use spacers that do restrict oil to act like sx seats?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

yep the spacers are on top of the spring seat.

found the nylon spacers that came out of a set of forks. fac. connection sells them. they were cool about selling these. they are not posted on their site.

they are 1.5mm and 2.5mm in thickness, and go on the bottom of fork.

i'm still trying to locate a suitable thrust bearing to use when i test spring rates.

i found some for the fork springs, but the shock is a little tougher. may have to order one of the kits they sell for the shock springs-all balls?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Reply with:

Sign in to follow this  

  • Similar Content

    • By smokey9lives
      Hi,
      I have a 2003 DRZ (actually a KLX400) and the head tube bearings are shot.  I ordered a new set to install but I'm wondering if anyone has any recommendations on other parts I should replace while I have the front disassembled.  I was thinking about new rubber fork protectors, but are there other things that wear out on the DRZ front ends that you can only get to when disassambled?
      I also broke off a replacement key that I got for the steering lock.  I must have been made of cheap pot-metal.  Should I just remove the whole lock mechanism?
      Any tips or tricks for getting the old bearings out and the new ones in would be welcome!
      Thanks!
    • By hondahondo
      A few picks of my winter project.













    • By Luke Hufford
      Hey guys. I recently purchased a 16 yz250x and the first 2 rides i LOVED the suspension. Then the day before a race i reset all my clickers to stock and everything felt like crap. No plushness at all and deflected off everything. I now have a 5.4 shock spring for my 190 pound weight and dialed in sag. Any recommendations on where i should go from here? Right now the fork is 12 out on comp and 15 out on rebound. Shock is 1.75 turns out on hsc, 14 out on lsc, and 18 out on rebound. Any help would be appreciated!
    • By jake gu
      Today we’re going to be talking a little bit about automotive suspensions and how they work to smoothen the ride of your car. There are mainly three purposes of the automotive suspension system. First, they support the  weight of the vehicle. Second, they maintain accurate tire contact with the ground. And third, they absorb any shock that you get through the road when you hit a bump.
      Most modern vehicles come with an independent front suspension. Which means if one wheel hits a bump it does not disturb the other wheel. Nowadays, people use Coil Spring to support the majority of weight in the car. As it has a really good characteristics for absorbing any bumps as you go up and down on the road.
      However Springs aren’t very good at dissipating that energy. In fact that’s why you have the shock absorber. Which is there to smoothen out the ride and make sure the tire maintains contact with the road.
      In modern passenger vehicles the two most popular suspensions are McPherson strut and double wishbone style of suspension. The main advantage of the McPherson strut suspension is that it’s really cheap and simple that’s why a lot of manufacturers are moving towards this design. The double wishbone design allows the wheel to stay perpendicular to the body as it navigates a corner or as it goes over a bump. And that maintains good tire contact patch no matter where the wheel is situated. Another advantage of this design is that it can be made adjustable where you can control the position of upper control arms ball Joints.
      Click to Know More About Ball Joints and other Suspension Components
×